Featured Title: Redhead, the new thriller by Ian Cook 'a compulsive read' |
|
| Britain BC |
|
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 132 guests and 3 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain
The Megalithic Portal and Megalith Map : Index >>
Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries >> Pyramid Texts
|
 |
| Page 1 of 3 ( 1 | 2 | 3 ) |
| Author |
Pyramid Texts |
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-10-2008 at 06:45  
Has anyone heard of the idea that the pyramid texts might be talking about the formation of our solar system? 9 gods of heliopolis - 9 planets of solar system- Ra-atum= sun. e.g. shu =mercury; tefnut =venus; geb =earth; mars =nut; jupiter=osiris; saturn=isis; uranus =set; neptune= nepthys (not sure who pluto is yet).. ; Horus could be some sort of a comet type thing or a moon - except there's stuff about horus's tail - so maybe comet...
So if that's the code - then gods are planets (for the purposes of the pyramid texts)
N. in the pyramid texts might be referring to a second sun?
-he 'surpasses our sun, is more like it; is weary; is bigger than it; is fresher (younger) than it - i.e. more massive star, more burnt out - and while it looks like atum (our sun) - its face is like anubis - dark? is it a brown dwarf star? Was it a massive planet like jupiter that turned into a star (Does anyone know enough astronomy to know if gaseous planets can become stars?)
(215 - 'for there is no god (planet) who has become a star who has not his companion.
This would be true - because if there was a solar system with a sun, and one of the planets also turned into a sun, then there would be 2 suns - a binary system. And every solar system where there was a planet that turned into a sun would be a binary system.
also talks about imperishable stars which might make sense to an astonomer.
Is 215 also talking about gravity? - Re Atum (sun) does not surender thee to Osiris (jupiter), he judges/numbers not thy heart; he gains not power over thy heart;
Osiris (jupiter) thou dost not gain power over him (set/uranus) - thy son gains not power over him...etc
Thoth is the moon
218 - N (second sun) comes, he is displeased with the Nine (bows?) (PLANETS), an imperishable spirit, ..to seize kas, etc...
The second sun's orbit periodically takes it through our solar system, potentially causing chaos and destruction to our nine planets...?
Ennead could mean our solar system
Is Apep this second sun? The heiroglyph for Apep includes what looks like a star with a blazing tail... (or comet or something???)
Apep has battled against our sun (Ra)
he's located, before dawn in the tenth region of hte night (sky); ...
Atum was the sun of the Ennead system - (our original solar system?); and Ra (was or became the sun of the Ogdoad system - 8 planets? or moons? around the planet that became a sun/sun): then they fused to become Atum-Ra (our present sun) o
Lotus story includes an explosive interaction -
did Atum collide with Ra?
Khephri may be something to do with this collision - a moon involved?
Not quite sure what exactly Horus is yet... (comet perhaps - perhaps linked to Ra/or Apep)..
After the collision, one of the suns may have shot off in an orbit that takes it out of our solar system for a bit, but it comes back...?
Apep is the biggest enemy of Ra-Atum (our sun) and of order and light - he has a terrifying roar and causes earthquakes; he hypnotises our sun and the gods (planets) and tries to devour them; he chokes the river on which they travel (interferes with their orbits?/gravity?)
Apep sometimes has assistance from Sek & Mot (his moons?)or asteroids he's picked up?
Our sun is assisted by its own defenders (the planets) to ward him off and send him on his way (ie. with their gravity etc...) _ Set (uranus) is the most powerful/useful in this respect?
When Apep gets the upper hand, there are thunderstorms, earthquakes and a solar eclipse..
In talking about the Ogdoad system it says there were 8 gods (planets) - these were unstable, which caused a new entity to arise? - the entity opened to reveal Ra, a fiery sun (planet that became a sun?)
About the Osiris/Isis/Set myth: Saturn (isis) reassembled Jupiter's (Osiris) corpse (via its gravity?)- Jupiter's son Horus (planet/comet?) was conceived by Saturn (isis) and Jupiter (Osiris) -or at least pieces of Jupiter (osiris) - Saturn's gravity created/re-assembled (resurrected)? Jupiter as well as a separate planet (moon?) Horus???
Horus is the enemy of Set (uranus) - and they have conflicts - Set damaged Horus (maybe on a flyby of Horus?) -
Some of hte details might be wrong, but i think it's in code. It doesn't make much sense otherwise; and some of the myths are pretty bizarre - which makes better sense if its coded.
As above, so below - anything happening in egypt's religion might have been intended to reflect these coded myths/information..
I think there could be multiple meanings to the codes used - perhaps planets are only level or layer of meaning to be uncovered - there could be more coded info about other things..
Especially when you think about how many messages and concepts the mathematical dimensions of the great pyramid are meant to convey - there is also coded info on precession and the stars in a lot of stories/myths..
Re: Anubis - Anubis was in the Ogdoad system - 4th son (planet or moon) of Ra (planet sun) - After the Atum/Ra merger into our present solar system - Anubis became a lesser god (planet?moon?) and gave way to Osiris (jupiter)????
  Profile
Reply
|
cropredy

Joined: 01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-10-2008 at 19:58  
Katie222,
Hello,
I often go to the British museum when in London, and am drawn to the Egyptian stuff.
I look at it all in my own way, as a dowser with electrical biase always.
I recognise what they were portraying, and the planets and star systems are the gods, or more specifically the consequence of the planets etc acting upon and causing interferance to the free flow of space relative to their position and and inter connected positions with others relative to the condition here on Earth, especially the precise alignment where the pyramids are sited, and there are several places where pyramids are sited globally.
I also recognise how they were contacting the so called gods and interacting with the alignments, they were dowsers, dowsers supreme, especially the women.
I you pay carefull attention to the hands and what they hold and how they are positioned, with the knowledge I have of a matrix lattice structure of universe, then You can begin to unravel the messages left.
You also have to consider the materials, how they were utilised and the interaction with a substance I feel is better called STUFF, as I am not certain of what it is, though its ability to turn into its opposite sort of charge polarity is the basis of creation, which most of the Egyptian artifacts are about.
They worshipped the scarab beetle , imho because they observd it, and knew its method of creation was relevant to the matrix lattice, it knows how to locate a precise point, and rolls it dung ball to that point, buries the ball there after laying an egg in the ball, covers it over, and later a new beetle appears.
The point all others have not been able to see is the point, a precise point of alignment with lines that match the gods, this lattice never ever moves, and the pyramids are aligned to it, and I KNEW why in an instant, and why the material was used, and why the tunnels inside them are filled with specific types of sands from many variant areas, and set at precise alignments that never move, because nothing is moving as we have been TOLD, not this planet or the sun or moon, and I KNOW how odd that sounds, nothing is moving except space, and we SEE via space, and via the fields about the created spheres.
As You can see, I look at things very very differently, and most doubt Me totally, most are wrong.
kevin
  Profile
Reply
|
mikecroley

Joined: 27-10-2006
Messages: 1655
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-10-2008 at 20:13  
The Pyramid texts are a guide for the Shaman through the Supernatural realms? A map!
mike
  Profile
Reply
|
brigantia

Joined: 13-01-2002
Messages: 804
from Yorkshire & Argyll
OFF-Line
| Posted 16-10-2008 at 22:48  
Hi Katie -
Quote:
|
On 2008-10-16 06:45, Katie222 wrote:
...Horus could be some sort of a comet type thing or a moon - except there's stuff about horus's tail - so maybe comet... |
|
Horus tended to be Sirius. Check Kenneth Grant's Magical Revival and subsequent works on this. Grant went gun-ho into the entire magico-religious exploration of the Egyptian mythos for many years, following Crowley's Thelemite paths, and more beside...
  Profile
Email
Reply
|
chimera

Joined: 09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 03:35  
Instantly I knew it was the matrix of Ma'at the dowstrix, who unmuffled 9 geese a month but most doubt me totally .
Halley's Comet leads by a head coming into the straight, and swerves closely around Ra with Jupiter bringing up the rear of the FIELD.
  Profile
Reply
|
Chyknel2

Joined: 27-05-2007
Messages: 2258
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 06:21  
Quote:
|
On 2008-10-16 19:58, cropredy wrote:
The point all others have not been able to see is the point, a precise point of alignment with lines that match the gods, this lattice never ever moves, and the pyramids are aligned to it, and I KNEW why in an instant |
|
Well, not a barefaced lie, which is progress. but then it's not Friday night yet. But not true - if the pyramids were aligned to a specific point they'd be lined up relative to one another, which they ain't - see Giza.
Students of how these things work will know the answer to this difficulty will lie in the fact that what look like crooked lines to us are in fact dead straight ones to Chosen Ones on the internet and what look like randomly placed molehills to us are dead straight ones to moles - or else perfect spirals (depending on whether it's Friday or not). The chocalate hills ARE chalk by the way, geologists are FULES.
[ This message was edited by: Chyknel2 on 2008-10-17 06:22 ]
  Profile
Reply
|
cropredy

Joined: 01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 08:31  
The pyramids,
as with all other constructions based upon the lattice structure relative to their position are aligned to a universal grid not of equal or square form, but that geometry is within the system at certain locations.
Fractal would be a better word to describe the geometry.
But it's basic construction is upon straight lines.
If you view the whole planet as a consequence of this geometry, what becomes evident are multiple points of super concentration of the geometry, those super points will radiate fibonacci spiral arms off from them with less super points along the spiral pathway of the arms.
You are dealing with a 2D slice through a vortex spiral pathway of geometry going out into universe and inward into the planet.
These spiral flows will be birkland currents that will permeate all of universe, and as they encounter other planets or stars along their pathway they will be subjected to resistance as they permeate the mass of the other planet/s etc, they will also alter in relative charge quantities due to the dominant charges of the planets they permeate which will be either positive or negative in relationship to Earth.
The pyramids will be sited to maximise the potential available of these flows, and will perfectly match the precise positioning of the flows.
Inside the pyramids will be anguler pathways filled with many different sands, these will harmonically match and interact with the specific flows relative to their alignments.
The kings chamber and queens chambers positioning will be to maximise the male and female duality aspects available, thus raising the potential of those within the perfectly formed sarcofagases.
These were nothing to do with death, they were all about creation.
Kevin
  Profile
Reply
|
chimera

Joined: 09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 08:32  
That's talking chalkalot
  Profile
Reply
|
MikeGreen

Joined: 21-06-2007
Messages: 19
from East Devon World Heritage Coast
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 08:59  
Quote:
|
On 2008-10-17 08:31, cropredy wrote:
You are dealing with a 2D slice through a vortex spiral pathway of geometry going out into universe and inward into the planet.
Kevin
|
|
Mmmm!! Does that mean every planet in the universe has its own, or are we so so special ?
  Profile
Reply
|
Chyknel2

Joined: 27-05-2007
Messages: 2258
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 12:25  
"Does that mean every planet in the universe has its own, or are we so so special ?"
.
Wibble.
See Kev! Awkward questions can be not answered and tangents and mumbo jumbo can be added with very few words.
Long, rambling answers are NOT required if you won't/can't answer perfectly valid questions.
Please also note (for tonight) the above answer was produced entirely without aid of beer.
  Profile
Reply
|
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 13:55  
Hi Kevin,
Your post was interesting - it made me wish i'd studied physics at high school- (astronomy too might have helped)
This could be a stupid question, but what's a dowser?
i like the idea of the fixed lattice -...
Do you know what the Ankh was? (also the Djed Pillar; the Rod that they carry; and the Benben..) The Ankh looks just like the 'buckets' that the gods are carrying in reliefs at Persepolis (when they're standing beside the tree of life -also holding pinecones -) and the same buckets can be seen on statues in Mexico and also in South America i think. Sometimes the 'gods' seem to be holding a bucket type object while inside the... lets call it spaceship - that's what it looks like - (refer to Maya carvings - e.g. palenque relief). Similarities in ancient world mythologies could be explained by the Egyptian myth that the divine king osiris travelled all over the world teaching agriculture etc. to everyone...
Is the bucket/ankh type thing what you're talking about when you say the stuff - the creation substance?
  Profile
Reply
|
cropredy

Joined: 01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 13:59  
Quote:
|
On 2008-10-17 08:59, MikeGreen wrote:
[quote]
On 2008-10-17 08:31, cropredy wrote:
You are dealing with a 2D slice through a vortex spiral pathway of geometry going out into universe and inward into the planet.
Kevin
|
|
Mmmm!! Does that mean every planet in the universe has its own, or are we so so special ?
[/quote]
It's not just one, multiple, and each planet, star etc will be positioned upon it's own unique set of them, thus creating it's own unique harmonic signature.
We are a consequence of the condition relative to the recent past here, this does not mean that the condition here has remained steady, and vast fluxtuations may have occured leading to alterations to the light and gravity around the earth.
I would speculate that the gravity was far less when such as the dinosors(if thats how you spell it?)were here, and the elephants and rhino's are left overs from that period.
http://greatdreams.com/gem1.htm
kevin
  Profile
Reply
|
karloff

Joined: 20-10-2006
Messages: 604
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 14:23  
Quote:
|
On 2008-10-17 13:55, Katie222 wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Your post was interesting - it made me wish i'd studied physics at high school- (astronomy too might have helped)
|
|
Hi
If you had you wouldn't have found it interesting.
  Profile
Reply
|
chimera

Joined: 09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 17-10-2008 at 22:10  
But astronme and physick is for this universe, not Kev's.
  Profile
Reply
|
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 05:48  
Wouldn't i, Karloff?
  Profile
Reply
|
chimera

Joined: 09-09-2006
Messages: 1508
from Australia
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 07:03  
Katie,
Kev takes us on fascinating journeys, like a poet or artist. Or someone who has car-keys removed by police. But science deletes the images he creates.
  Profile
Reply
|
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 07:17  
ehg...
well, i dunno, haven't read that many of his threads & since didn't study physics, can't comment. Don't think science has come up with all the answers yet but.
  Profile
Reply
|
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 07:31  
For example, i'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how and with what tools, and why, ancient neolithic people, who had just discovered farming and not that long ago, fire, wanted to or could, build pyramids (all over the world) and macchu picchu/sacsayhuaman. I know they were mucking around with stone tools and pretty rustic pottery at the same time, but it just doesn't make sense.
(And i have heard the...oh five hundred slaves, they used sand to lift them, copper/bronze tools, etc...explanation, and i think its quite funny). (So i think, do many construction engineers, crane operators and modern day stone quarriers from what i've heard).
And another thing - with the isolationist theory - i.e. primitive people couldn't sail all over the world (or get there somehow).. then how come there are dolmen all over the world, from england, to jordan to india to korea, and how come the same religious icons and structures keep popping up everywhere you look... stone spheres in Bosnia; Stone spheres in central america ...la la la.. Pyramids in Bosnia, Pyramids in China, Pyramids in Egypt, Pyramids in Mexico, Pyramids in the Pacific; Pyramids in Australia.. (stirring).
I am going to have a cup of tea now.
  Profile
Reply
|
Katie222

Joined: 20-09-2008
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 08:31  
So what was in the sarcophagi?
I completely agree with you about the dinosaur and larger sized animals being probably a relic from when - i don't know if it's gravity that was different (doesn't that depend on the size of hte planet which wouldn't change? (or would it?) I thought it might be when the earth's electro-magnetic field (?) was different? I saw an experiment on utube about this - changing the strength of the field - and the fish changed size dramatically (they grew much bigger compared to the control fish in a normal tank). I think that at an earlier time, the earth's electromagnetic field was different - leading to much bigger sized animals and plants roaming the planet - perhaps even much bigger sized humans ( see: reports of argentinian giants sighted by elizabethan, etc, sailors).. and other reports..
The fractal thing makes sense... fractals everywhere.
Re: harmonics - do you mean sound? I've read that sound is really important in creation - creates geometric patterns in water etc; and the pyramids have strange properties re sound. Indian mystics use sound to levitate a stone (see childress's lost city book about asia) = i think the druids were also sposed to use sound to do 'magic'; and the egyptians say that Isis was a very competent magician and knew how to say words in a certain way...to achieve the same sort of thing.
  Profile
Reply
|
cropredy

Joined: 01-01-2006
Messages: 5539
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| Posted 20-10-2008 at 08:31  
Katie222,
It's always tea time, down here, and down here is not restricted to the constraints of 3D proofs.
down here time need not exist, and the planet and all in the universe can be alive, because it is.
I can follow the breathing of time, and so can the rocks which are created here, if you were to match the planets measure , and position according to the geometric brilliance of universe, then the potentials can be utilised.
Kevin
  Profile
Reply
| |
| Go to Page: 1 | 2 | 3 |
 |
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use. If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.
Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.
|