| Review your Reply |
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
 OFF-Line
|  New Message Posted!2013-02-24 15:43
Hi Andy just before I conclude this descussion I'd like to ask you what chronology you use for the earliest Neolithic farmers in Britain 2/ the chalcolithic in Britain and 3/the early Bronze age in Britain depending on the location sited.
For example 1/ Neolithic (Earliest Farmers)...................4000 BC
.................2/ Chalcolithic.......................................2200 BC
..................3/ Bronze Age......................................2000 BC
..................4/ Iron Age.....................................600/500 BC?
In Conclusion to be fare and open minded to
everyone I think diffrent authors have diffrent dating techniques just as in young earth creationism diffrent chroniclers dont always aggree with Bishop Ussher John
|
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-23 14:06
Yes Sem I've herd of it. Maybe that's the one that coursed the dinosaur extinction.
As for the second millenium BC I believe Velekovskey maybe refurring to the event of 2349/48 BC which in conventional terms is about 50000-20,000 yrs Bp followed by the Post Flood Rappid Ice age so whether Venus or not is probably a figment of the immagination or some other astroid which I would'nt totally rule out John
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1604
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-22 19:52
Maybe so but conventionalscientists of the "uniformitarian view" (or at least some of them) insist there was an astroid strike supposedly 65'000000 yrs ago in which dinosaurs became alledgidly extinct so at least some "catastrophism concepts" here. [sic] - get a spell checker, John.
Re: "asteroid" strike - haven't you heard of Chicxulub?
However, Velikovsky claimed that Venus arrived in its orbit in the 2nd millennium BCE. Only someone totally ignorant of basic physics would believe that.
|
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-22 13:59
In comclusion I've learned some interesting ideas from you guys depending on what ideas some diffrent authors gave on dating the stone age cultures of Britain &c compared say with my concepts and would respect their views.
Thus you cannot have everyone of the same persuasion and views so it is better to work together at it and try and evaluate some of the mysteries of the Prehistoric period, John
|
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-22 13:43
Maybe so but conventionalscientists of the "uniformitarian view" (or at least some of them) insist there was an astroid strike supposedly 65'000000 yrs ago in which dinosaurs became alledgidly extinct so at least some "catastrophism concepts" here.
I think one has toask one;s self "Where does folk lore; ledgends mythology &c meet the facts?"
There is a new interesting book out on Atlantis and they back Velekovskey's consepts.
Unfortunately hard line evolutionists of the persuasion of Richard Dawkins would try to supress these ideas and most probably try to stop books ofthis type from being published.
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1604
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-21 08:19
Maybe you should read this book as well - Scientists Confront Velikovsky
Basically, the premise behind Worlds in Collision is garbage, and has been shown to be so.
|
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-21 04:05
What about Velekovskey and "Worlds in Collision" as an example ok it is out of date but certainly not 200 years, John
|
johnhext-fremlin
Joined:
23-12-2012
Messages: 48
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-19 14:18
Hi Sem thanks for your feedbackon this discussion. Yes indeed I am reffuring to Archbishop James Ussher and his chronology for a toung age of the earth about 4004 BC.
t
However I believe that as some people at this forum have already sugested you can't put an exact date on what is defined as the "Neolithic age" as it started at diffrent times and in diffrent places world wide.
I would like to sugest that where local traditions ledgends; folklore &c are concerned I believe that there is no "smoke without fire" also regarding a rappid Post flood Ice Age and Ice plannet strikes.
Of course I realize that allot of this is perhaps wild speculation but it would I aggree nake a most interesting thread for discussion and would like to dugest that some of these annomalies be investigated and evaluated. Please do visit my website at http://www.johnhextfremlin.com
All the Best and Good Hunting John
|
davidmorgan
Joined:
23-11-2006
Messages: 1604
from The New Forest
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-19 09:59
One cannot I would sugest change the chronology simply because a book is out of date
The book I'm guessing you're basing a chronology on is over two thousand years out of date.
|
sem
Joined:
12-11-2003
Messages: 1709
from Bridgend,S.Wales
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-02-18 23:56
Hi John
Luckily you have landed on your feet with the MegP Mysteries Forum - we're always interested in new ideas.
When you talk about "creationist", are you referring to James Ussher's assertion that the world was created in 4004BC? If so it seems a good place to start a science versus legend discussion.
Best wishes
Sem
|
Main News