Featured Title:
Pictures from the Past: Art and Symbols of the Neolithic and Bronze Age |
 |
| Megaliths by David Corio |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 112 guests and 6 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
| Review your Reply |
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
 OFF-Line
|  New Message Posted!2013-01-17 15:25
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:43 ]
|
Sanchez
Joined:
12-07-2006
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-17 11:24
Quote:
|
On 2013-01-14 23:45, Kagaku wrote:
These two astronomical lines align to a large number of ancient sites. Scientifically speaking they also however miss a large number of sites.
|
|
Yeah, perhaps it's time to mark that line of reasoning down as 'coincidence' then. The human mind tries hard to find patterns in chaos and leads us to very un-scientific conclusions. Please be careful, it'll destroy any credibility you want to build.
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-14 23:45
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:43 ]
|
Sanchez
Joined:
12-07-2006
Messages: 202
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-14 10:53
Unless I'm mistaken, you've overlaid your star map onto a 'Mercator Projection' style visualisation of the earth's landmasses. Mercator's prjection allows the surface of a sphere to be viewed on a flat sheet of paper, but it results in great distortion in positions and distances. The distortion getting even greater as the offset from the equator increases. So, are you saying that ancient people not only built population centres depending on the position of stars, but used a Mercator's projeciton or similar to do so??
I only ask as Mercators project is a 16th C construct and prior to that maps created using the traditional cartesian co-ordinates produced very strange looking Ptolemaic style maps bearing little relation to actual sizes and shapes of landmass.
Here's a ptolemaic map of the UK. I'm sure the implications for the star map versus earth positional alignment are obvious...
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-11 20:23
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:42 ]
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-10 11:06
[ This message was edited by: Kagaku on 2013-01-26 03:42 ]
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-04 16:30
Just a quick update
the paperback version of the Book is now out....
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-04 16:04
The video I have to say is less convincing than the description.......
Anyone know why the stones obtained their various names?
|
Kagaku
Joined:
15-05-2011
Messages: 120
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-04 10:58
Have a look at the discussion just started on Argimusco, the Mirror of The Stars
The list of stars at Argimusco is almost exactly the same as those I published in my theory that an ancient civilization used the stars to map the earth.
http://www.amazon.com/Khyung-The-Stone-Astronaut-ebook/dp/B00ADXHQ06
First the Pyramids are Cygnus in mirror format. Cygnus is the only constellation that has a north pole star and also is found on the Milky Way, and in the map theory it occupies the location of Europe/North Africa
The complete list of constellations used in my theory for mapping Asia, Europe, Australia, and Africa the constellations used are Cygnus, Aquila (the Eagle), Ophiuchus, Hercules, Sagitta (the Arrow), Vulpecula, Gemini (the twins), Dracos (the snake?)...and the head of Hydra which appears in a later wrap.
Leo is the reset constellation in the Mayan Reset
Here at Argimusco, the constellations listed are
(SWAN, ARROW, EAGLE, SNAKE, OPHIUCHUS, VIRGIN, LEO, SEXTANS, CROW, HYDRA AND CRATER)
between the two lists there are only a couple of minor differences
The number 11 is the 11 Karanas....
this I have to investigate......
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2658
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-01-04 10:26
2Still known ", as in not forgotten ?
The Invereen stone is a Class 1 and unlikely to be much earlier than 600 AD .
George
| |
|
Main News