The Megalithic Portal
 - please click to visit this advertiser
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
Festival of British Archaeology Events
Stonehenge Summer Solstice 2013
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Dobbin

Featured Title:
Cave Of Forgotten Dreams on DVD
Cave Of Forgotten Dreams on DVD

Serpent’s Gold by Sam Osman
Serpent’s Gold by Sam Osman

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 107 guests and 2 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Forum:  Stones Forum
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem Respond to:  Stonehenge-Preselli links talk
Preferences Registered Users You can Post new messages or replies to this Forum
NickName
Password
Message Icon                 
                
                
                
                
                
    
Message

HTML : On
BBCode : On

Click to add Smilies into your Message:

:-):-(:-D;-):-08-):-?:-P:-|:-|:-|:-|

Click to add BBCode to your Message:



   

Review your Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2708

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-10-10 19:06   
That's in in a nutshell , there is no direct evidence for the transport of the Bluestones by human agency just as there is no direct evidence that humans lifted the lintels it's simply not there , although in the latter case there is no doubt that it was done by human agency .
Similarly there is no direct evidence that the bluestones were moved to , at best , within 15 K from Stonehenge or even entrained from any of the potential Preseli sites . Just because a glacier is capable of doing so doesn't mean that it did , same thing applies to the human agency theory . Lots of energy spent discussing the impasse but not much light , however apart from the debate we do know a bit more than we did due to the provenancing .

George

Quote:

On 2012-10-10 18:30, cerrig wrote:
Having now finished the book by Mountainman, it has to be said that he has made a very convincing case for glacial involvement. He has admitted that it isn't a knockout case, but it does put a lot of reality into the debate that was, for most people anyway, missing.
There has to be some doubt about natural forces taking the stones to Wiltshire, simply because the hard evidence is incomplete , and a fair bit of theory has to be believed as well.
This is, of course, also true for the human transport theory too, but crucially, the question of human involvement is obviously not in doubt, it's the amount that's controversial.
The problem with both theories is that neither of them can join Preseli to Stonehenge without a large dose of circumstantial evidence.
Some professional analysis of Mountainmans evidence would be very welcome now.

The jury is still out, but it's split

Cerrig

Cerrig





cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 918
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-10-10 18:30   
Having now finished the book by Mountainman, it has to be said that he has made a very convincing case for glacial involvement. He has admitted that it isn't a knockout case, but it does put a lot of reality into the debate that was, for most people anyway, missing.
There has to be some doubt about natural forces taking the stones to Wiltshire, simply because the hard evidence is incomplete , and a fair bit of theory has to be believed as well.
This is, of course, also true for the human transport theory too, but crucially, the question of human involvement is obviously not in doubt, it's the amount that's controversial.
The problem with both theories is that neither of them can join Preseli to Stonehenge without a large dose of circumstantial evidence.
Some professional analysis of Mountainmans evidence would be very welcome now.

The jury is still out, but it's split

Cerrig

Cerrig

cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 918
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-27 18:52   


Quote:

On 2012-09-27 14:49, PeteG wrote:
ignore the bluestones found on Silbury bit. This is a missprint in the report Brian had at the time.
As it now stands 4 pieces of small bluestone were found on the summit. One by Atkinson in 1970 and 3 by Jim Leary in 2007.
PeteG

Sounds suspicious, perhaps they were put there fairly recently. Odd little stones and memento's at these places isn't uncommon.

Cerrig



PeteG



Joined:
21-11-2002


Messages: 287
from Avebury

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-27 14:49   
ignore the bluestones found on Silbury bit. This is a missprint in the report Brian had at the time.
As it now stands 4 pieces of small bluestone were found on the summit. One by Atkinson in 1970 and 3 by Jim Leary in 2007.
PeteG

cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 918
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-27 10:31   
Half way through the book. The case for the Defence in "the Establishment V Mountainman" has concluded . Very interesting so far, lots of curious and imaginative theories about, not very complimentary to the Archaeologists though, or Geomorphologists, or Historians, or English Heritage, but Robin Heath got a thumbs up

The Defence will now present. I can't wait to see who wins, the suspense is unbearable.

Cerrig



cerrig



Joined:
25-09-2009


Messages: 918
from Brecon Beacons

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-24 17:36   


Quote:

On 2012-09-20 20:48, cerrig wrote:


Quote:

On 2012-09-20 20:19, Andy B wrote:
Cerrig, PM me your address and I'll send you my copy of Brian John's book,(The Bluestones Enigma)



That's very generous of you Andy, but if you sell this book through this site I will aquire a copy that way. (you may need your copy to be a referee)



Book arrived today, through Andy's link above, from Amazon(£8.96) . I look just like this smilie when I read.

Cerrig



[ This message was edited by: cerrig on 2012-09-26 06:33 ]

Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2425
from UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-24 16:59   
Hi Feather and welcome.

In profile, the terrain from Wales to Wilts is up and down, a lot. Like a small range of large hills and a few mountains.
So while it would be comparatively easy to sled a counterbalanced large lump of stone down an icy path, in your dream, how did the people move the stones up the correspondingly steep uphill icy paths to cross the next ridge? That's what we all want to know

Rune

Quote:

On 2012-09-24 14:48, feather wrote:
I dreamed that the stones were moved in winter, tied to a sledge, and dragged down an icy trail. Easier to handle the weights with ropes, and slide it down to Wiltshire.





feather



Joined:
14-11-2010


Messages: 1
from San Diego, CA

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-24 14:48   
I dreamed that the stones were moved in winter, tied to a sledge, and dragged down an icy trail. Easier to handle the weights with ropes, and slide it down to Wiltshire.

tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2708

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-23 10:01   

Sem,
I'm pretty sure the matches for Rhosyfelin would have been from the Stonehenge "layer " in the Darvill- Wainwright case .The one near the Heelstone possibly from the layer , I don't know for sure .
George
Quote:

On 2012-09-23 00:11, sem wrote:
George
Were the "matches" taken from bits of stone in the ground or from "The Stones"?
Sem







sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1722
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-09-23 00:11   
George
Were the "matches" taken from bits of stone in the ground or from "The Stones"?
Sem



IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.