Featured Title:
See Your Book Here |
 |
| MeZolith Graphic Novel |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 140 guests and 3 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
| Review your Reply |
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5541
from Oxon
 ON-Line
|  New Message Posted!2013-05-22 09:20
I do not fail , at all.
cropredy
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2647
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-22 09:17
Either you can't count or you were wrong about the number of off topic attributable to either of us .
I believe ,but have no evidence , that judging by the primary 2 language you should also have the skills required but are afraid to do so because , yet again when faced with providing evidence you fail , although in this case it obviously exists . Go on , give it a go ,a real experiment , it will be a first ,who knows what it might lead to .
|
rogeralbin
Joined:
08-10-2010
Messages: 190
 OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-22 08:09
Where is all the dark matter?
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5541
from Oxon
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 20:37
Sem,
Why are You saying that "light is a figment of our imagination"?
cropredy
|
sem
Joined:
12-11-2003
Messages: 1707
from Bridgend,S.Wales
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 20:12
Kevin
As light etc is a figment of our imagination, why are you posting on the subject of "Solar alignments"?
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5541
from Oxon
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 20:07
Tiompan,
Your above post is inferring that I cannot count, which is offensive, and a personal attack....again.
The LIES are by YOU, when You state fact like that I cannot do that which I post I can....again this is offensive personal attacks, and has been going on a very long time, which I attempt to defend against , thus the dragging off topic of threads, which is instigated by You, but inferred as been by myself.
Your post again demonstrates fully Your agenda slanted against My personal understandings of what is detectable, and three times You have inferred that I am in some way deluded in My thinkings , which in a mammoth variety of ways You have never stopped with terms such as mumbo jumbo etc etc thrown in for better effect.
You can doubt all You please, but You are and have on countless times stepped over sceptical doubtings into offensive personal rhetoric.
Stop telling Me I cannot do what I can, You are in no position to declare such, and the consequences are boring in the extreme, not just for anyone else, but definately for myself.
If We were up in the hallowed stones section I could understand to some extent Your constant stupid demands for proof, as I except the owners terms for that section, but this section is for those who dowse etc .If You don't like or believe those who dowse go upstairs or other stoneheads locations where You can be king of the castle.
1+1=2
Do I now get an O level???
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2013-05-21 20:09 ]
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5541
from Oxon
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 19:24
Geometry is the basis of all alignments, but what geometry?
Here's a little thought that has for some reason permeated Me.
We are products of 3D creation, hence We view from 3D and consider such as to be the solid, but.....
Consider instead that universe is the solid, and composed of perfectly packed geometric STUFF.
The geometry of this STUFF enables multiple dimensions in the self same location, and all of these are memory based, the illusion from our observers location of been the solids is understandable.
Thus the solid packed universe is fixed, and is the stator which the displacing memory fields are the rotors in an electric magnetic system.
The geometry then becomes scalar at all scales, and dependant on what geometric pathway the memory is travelling upon determines the creation involved.
The consequences of such a wacky comprehension of nature relative to a bunch of such geometric pathways all interacting with each other as our solar system is will lead to self similer alignments at all scale.
As above, so below.
The whole view We have of the heavens will then be reflected onto the surface of this planet, and all other similer as sort of mirror images.
Difficult to verbalise, in the extreme.
cropredy
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2647
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 17:52
Tom , I'm not quite sure what you are saying but geoglyphs are something specific and while it may be possible to dowse one , simply dowsing and coming up with a design does not make it a geoglyph .
You didn't mention how many markers were used for the petals .
When dowsing spirals do you ever start at the extreme point and work towards the centre ?
George
|
tiompan
Joined:
09-01-2005
Messages: 2647
ON-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 17:44
You often mention lies , other favourites seem to be crap and stupid .
Primary 2 ?
Read through the posts on this thread and see how many are off topic in relation to me and yourself , it does involve counting .
Your rods move and you believe that it is due to some unrecordable force . Why should you believe that when there are far simpler more obvious explanations . Further you believe this force is the cause of the siting of megalithic sites , once again with nothing to support that belief . why believe something so unlikely when there are far simpler explanations . Then we have the wonderful “everything is made from the substance flowing along the lines “ . Once again why believe something so unlikely and with nothing to support it ?
Most of us realise why you believe it but once it has been said what more is there to say ,apart fro mthe primary 2 stuff which seems to have replace it . ? You might actually provide something to support it that would be interesting .
|
vlad
Joined:
13-05-2006
Messages: 1291
from Stockholm
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2013-05-21 10:27
One example of modern pseudo-scientific censorship is the case of ley-lines. I can`t believe Dr. Watkins knew not their rightful old name - WODEN`S ROUTES.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ley_line : "Watkins never attributed any supernatural significance to leys; he believed that they were simply pathways that had been used for trade or ceremonial purposes, very ancient in origin, possibly dating back to the Neolithic, certainly pre-Roman." - Wouldn`t it be more logical to develop psychology of religions, instead of pretending there were no such traditions imprinted since time immemorial in everyone`s mind!?
I know the rightful name for the ley-lines but it doesn`t mean that I`m a practicing natural-religion believer or a magician. But when someone wants to discuss ley-lines with me I must refuse, because this name do not represent any "reality", in my eyes. We should also remember that people using Woden`s routes considered themselves as being not only material bodies as we nowadays pretend to be.
[ This message was edited by: vlad on 2013-05-21 10:59 ]
| |
|
Main News