The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
Festival of British Archaeology Events
Stonehenge Summer Solstice 2013
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Old Sarum

Featured Title:
Bending the Boyne: a Novel of Ancient Ireland
Bending the Boyne: a Novel of Ancient Ireland

MeZolith Graphic Novel
MeZolith Graphic Novel

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 119 guests and 1 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Forum:  Stones Forum
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem Respond to:  Stonehenge was based on a \'magical\' auditory illusion, says scientist
Preferences Registered Users You can Post new messages or replies to this Forum
NickName
Password
Message Icon                 
                
                
                
                
                
    
Message

HTML : On
BBCode : On

Click to add Smilies into your Message:

:-):-(:-D;-):-08-):-?:-P:-|:-|:-|:-|

Click to add BBCode to your Message:



   

Review your Reply
tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2708

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 22:30   
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtpGyZif-h8

No need for circular breathing on the pipes as they have a bag .

There are plenty of problems with this , I first flagged it up 26/9/11http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=4764&forum=4&start=20
I asked Steve on an archaeoacoustic forum "Did the participants walk in only one direction i.e.
clockwise or anti-clockwise ?. I am thinking of the different pitch and in this case possibly different interference perception dependent on which ear
(right or left ) was exposed to the pitch(es) .
Was there a reason for two sound sources and if so why the same pitch , and was that to avoid difference tones .? "
Other problems are the diameter of the "circle was 7.6 m , the height of the sarsens but a long way from anything like any of the circle diameters at the monument . No control .The wind generator would have had an auditory impact too etc . Didn't get a reply


George


Quote:

On 2012-02-17 21:39, Andy B wrote:
Circular breathing is pretty difficult on low resistance wind instruments such as the flute. Didgeridoos and suchlike won't exhibit this effect - you need a high frequency pure tone - as close to a sine wave as possible - ie a flute. Bagpipes wouldn't work either, unless someone invented some sort of 'flute bagpipes'. A reedy bagpipe sound is rich in harmonics. The harmonic frequencies from the two instruments won't create standing wave cancellations in the same places in space as the fundamental tones, so you won't get same strong cancellation effect. And as I said you also need two fixed amplitudes and closely fixed point sources for the effect to work.





[ This message was edited by: tiompan on 2012-02-17 22:42 ]

Andy B



Joined:
13-02-2001


Messages: 7050
from Surrey, UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 21:39   
Circular breathing is pretty difficult on low resistance wind instruments such as the flute. Didgeridoos and suchlike won't exhibit this effect - you need a high frequency pure tone - as close to a sine wave as possible - ie a flute. Bagpipes wouldn't work either, unless someone invented some sort of 'flute bagpipes'. A reedy bagpipe sound is rich in harmonics. The harmonic frequencies from the two instruments won't create standing wave cancellations in the same places in space as the fundamental tones, so you won't get same strong cancellation effect. And as I said you also need two fixed amplitudes and closely fixed point sources for the effect to work.

tiompan



Joined:
09-01-2005


Messages: 2708

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 13:52   
Of course it 's more nonsense . Like all the recent archaeoacoustic theories the proponents tend not to be an acoustician ,you get archaeologists , musicians , cyberneticians and all make fundamental errors never mind the basic premise being unlikely .
The circular breathing technique allows wind players to play continuous pitches for long periods .
George

Quote:

On 2012-02-17 00:12, Andy B wrote:
I'm not putting this in the news as it strikes me as utter nonsense. I'm all for acoustic research at ancient sites but please.

The Neolithic builders of Stonehenge were inspired by "auditory illusions" when they drew up blueprints for the ancient monument, a researcher claims.

The radical proposal follows a series of experiments by US scientist Steven Waller, who claims the positions of the standing stones match patterns in sound waves created by a pair of musical instruments.

Waller, an independent researcher in California, said the layout of the stones corresponded to the regular spacing of loud and quiet sounds created by acoustic interference when two instruments played the same note continuously.

In Neolithic times, the nature of sound waves – and their ability to reinforce and cancel each other out – would have been mysterious enough to verge on the magical, Waller said. Quiet patches created by acoustic interference could have led to the "auditory illusion" that invisible objects stood between a listener and the instruments being played, he added.

To investigate whether instruments could create such auditory illusions, Waller rigged two flutes to an air pump so they played the same note continuously. When he walked around them in a circle, the volume rose, fell and rose again as the sound waves interfered with each other. "What I found unexpected was how I experienced those regions of quiet. It felt like I was being sheltered from the sound. As if something was protecting me. It gave me a feeling of peace and quiet," he said.

It then goes on to demonstrate auditory interference pattern created when two instruments play the same note continuously

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/16/stonehenge-based-magical-auditory-illusion?commentpage=last#end-of-comments

How on earth is this relevant to the practicalities of an ancient society? In order to get strong, static cancellations in the sound you would need equal and unvarying sound pressure levels from each instrument, and for the sources to be from the same two points in space.

How precisely would two flute players do this in practice without an air pump? ie having to take breaths and carry on this trick for any length of time. I have heard plenty of psuedoscientific theories about Stonehenge and this is is up with the best of them for impracticality!







Runemage



Joined:
15-07-2005


Messages: 2425
from UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 13:27   
I thought it was a spoof article what with the acronym for the organisation (AAAS) and these quotes

"...they would have felt there were these massive objects arranged in a ring. It would have been this completely baffling experience"

"The site was originally a burial ground, but may also have been a place for healing."

Rune





tDrusin



Joined:
21-01-2012


Messages: 156
from charleston, sc usa

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 00:52   
Marijuana is medicinally legal in California.

Andy B



Joined:
13-02-2001


Messages: 7050
from Surrey, UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2012-02-17 00:12   
I'm not putting this in the news as it strikes me as utter nonsense. I'm all for acoustic research at ancient sites but please.

The Neolithic builders of Stonehenge were inspired by "auditory illusions" when they drew up blueprints for the ancient monument, a researcher claims.

The radical proposal follows a series of experiments by US scientist Steven Waller, who claims the positions of the standing stones match patterns in sound waves created by a pair of musical instruments.

Waller, an independent researcher in California, said the layout of the stones corresponded to the regular spacing of loud and quiet sounds created by acoustic interference when two instruments played the same note continuously.

In Neolithic times, the nature of sound waves – and their ability to reinforce and cancel each other out – would have been mysterious enough to verge on the magical, Waller said. Quiet patches created by acoustic interference could have led to the "auditory illusion" that invisible objects stood between a listener and the instruments being played, he added.

To investigate whether instruments could create such auditory illusions, Waller rigged two flutes to an air pump so they played the same note continuously. When he walked around them in a circle, the volume rose, fell and rose again as the sound waves interfered with each other. "What I found unexpected was how I experienced those regions of quiet. It felt like I was being sheltered from the sound. As if something was protecting me. It gave me a feeling of peace and quiet," he said.

It then goes on to demonstrate auditory interference pattern created when two instruments play the same note continuously

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/feb/16/stonehenge-based-magical-auditory-illusion?commentpage=last#end-of-comments

How on earth is this relevant to the practicalities of an ancient society? In order to get strong, static cancellations in the sound you would need equal and unvarying sound pressure levels from each instrument, and for the sources to be from the same two points in space.

How precisely would two flute players do this in practice without an air pump? ie having to take breaths and carry on this trick for any length of time. I have heard plenty of psuedoscientific theories about Stonehenge and this is is up with the best of them for impracticality!



IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.