On 2012-03-21 17:44, jonm wrote:

Quote:

I also asked about a proper dig before re erecting begins, sadly he told me there wasn't funding for this. He discovered them and has been tasked with putting them back. I had suggested using methods available at the time to add an air of authenticity.

The danger, with not doing an archaeological dig of the site prior to re-erection, is that more harm than good will be done. It may not matter if the stones are insignificant but by putting the stones back, he may destroy all trace of how the stones were originally set up.

Just a thought. Don't want to put a damper on the exercise.

I also asked about a proper dig before re erecting begins, sadly he told me there wasn't funding for this. He discovered them and has been tasked with putting them back. I had suggested using methods available at the time to add an air of authenticity.

On 2012-03-21 14:43, frogcottage42 wrote:
Hi Teresa, with regard to moving stones;

The actual process of moving the stones back into place is very straightforward and requires nothing more than brute force and the application of some simple levers, fulcrums and pulleys and ropes. ( these days mechanical excavators tend to provide the grunt required)
It is the preparation of the sockets that is critical.
Before any attempt is made to replace a stone where it is believed to have been a proper archaeological excavation of the site needs to be conducted, proper recording of the current state of the monument and all stages of excavation. The methods for these digs are clearly outlined by the agencies responsible in most parts of the world but if not any archaeological society or museum will help.
Once this has been done a full plan of reconstruction must be created and strictly adhered to. This is very important because in the future any reconstruction may be questioned in the light of better understanding and reorganised appropriately.
Any stones having other stones placed on top must be thoroughly explored to ensure correct position and stability.
Once all that is done any stones replaced must be packed with suitable material which should be noted at excavation.

Saying all this I do not know what the official view of these things is in Pakistan but here in Europe very few sites will ever get permission for reconstruction.
Sites like Newgrange have been so badly molested by these processes that the general view is to leave well alone, every part of these monuments can tell a story, even their destruction.
Once tidied up future archaeological investigation will be pointless so great justification is required.

If your friend needs specific advice on moving stones then please feel free to contact me by private message and I will do what I can.

Quote:

On 2012-03-21 03:43, tDrusin wrote: I have an acquaintance in Pakistan who is in charge or re erecting six megalithic sites he discovered. He reached out to me for advice and suggestions, unfortunately I felt unable to help. I remember reading about someone here who moved stones regularly. Perhaps if you get a moment you could offer some technical insights. I'll copy and paste replies to him or you can find him on my facebook page. His name is Zulfiqar Ali Kalhoro. You can find him in my friends list. My real name is Teresa Drusin. Thanks I think this guy is underfunded for the magnitude of his project, and would surely appreciate a helping hand.

On 2012-03-21 03:43, tDrusin wrote:
I have an acquaintance in Pakistan who is in charge or re erecting six megalithic sites he discovered. He reached out to me for advice and suggestions, unfortunately I felt unable to help. I remember reading about someone here who moved stones regularly. Perhaps if you get a moment you could offer some technical insights. I'll copy and paste replies to him or you can find him on my facebook page. His name is Zulfiqar Ali Kalhoro. You can find him in my friends list. My real name is Teresa Drusin. Thanks I think this guy is underfunded for the magnitude of his project, and would surely appreciate a helping hand.