Featured Title:
See Your Book Here |
 |
| Hengeworld |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 98 guests and 1 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
| Review your Reply |
AlbertResonox
Joined:
17-03-2008
Messages: 1280
from Sussex
 OFF-Line
|  New Message Posted!2008-12-16 17:57
I was predicting(with a degree of success,even if I say so myself) your responses on the basis of past responses...not via timetravel...this is called using logic,something you deny exists.....Now correct me if I'm wrong...you claim to have travelled "the matrix" with the blessings of those in charge of it...or do you now deny that post too?
|
Ben
Joined:
05-11-2008
Messages: 62
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 16:53
Quote:
|
That is;=- "you won't get a straight answer"followed by a load of off thread garbage.
|
|
seems to be pretty true so far doesn't it?
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5547
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 16:51
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-15 18:31, AlbertResonox wrote:
You won't get a straight answer...just more of the same ....it's as if by printing more and more words that you might not notice there is zero sense content.Just because a balloon gets bigger by filling it with air,it doesn't become another entity....it still remains a balloon...and so it is with Kev's pseudo-science replies!
I've tried nice responses,sarcasm and genuine questions......nothing ever gets explained or answered.....except I am now aware I am as thick as two short planks(not even the dignity involved in being akin to two long planks...even though I argued that their thickness would remain the same regardless of length!).
Expect flim-flam and smoke and mirrors!!!
|
|
This is your full post that I referred to time travel, You state as fact something that may or may not occur in the future , that you can see as occuring in a particuler way.
That is;=- "you won't get a straight answer"followed by a load of off thread garbage.
Kevin
|
Ben
Joined:
05-11-2008
Messages: 62
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 16:50
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-16 15:13, cropredy wrote:
Ben,
Nobody really knows what they are talking about regarding creation etc.
It is all outside of our normal senses and laws relating to primerilly 3D.
Answers therefore will seem somewhat vague as each person struggles to find the correct words, and those words are already assigned to other things.
It's all about trying to utilise whatever best fits or explains, but ultimately it's a personal journey.
Another set of symbols or words may be needed, as at the moment there is a hodge podge of ever so many different words all possibly trying to explain the same thing. |
|
What a cop-out
If this were the case then what use is it trying to communicate your ideas in this way? and why try and support them with links to other websites with alternative or accepted ideas when they are in no doubt talking about something totally different from you although using the same/similar words?
Quote:
| If you listen to more of father Charlie Moore you will find him a fabulous linguist and historian as well as an electrical engineer, and a wonderfull manner of explaing the almost impossible to explain. |
|
I think I have had enough of his garbage, I am also doubting the claim that he is an electrical engineer after hearing what he said on that link you recommended.
|
AlbertResonox
Joined:
17-03-2008
Messages: 1280
from Sussex
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 15:52
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-15 19:01, cropredy wrote:
Obviously the words of one who can time travel and see events before they occur, not.
kevin
|
|
Of course my words won't be of someone who can timetravel and see future events,I'm trying to remember when I said I could do this....Oh obviously I haven't done so yet...but probably will in the very near future(not!)....However,are your words those of a timetraveller???
In which case you can post a quote and reply to the 3rd next post I put up...(in case you don't understand.....what will I post 3 posts after this one and how will you respond???)
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5547
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 15:13
Ben,
Nobody really knows what they are talking about regarding creation etc.
It is all outside of our normal senses and laws relating to primerilly 3D.
Answers therefore will seem somewhat vague as each person struggles to find the correct words, and those words are already assigned to other things.
It's all about trying to utilise whatever best fits or explains, but ultimately it's a personal journey.
Another set of symbols or words may be needed, as at the moment there is a hodge podge of ever so many different words all possibly trying to explain the same thing.
If you listen to more of father Charlie Moore you will find him a fabulous linguist and historian as well as an electrical engineer, and a wonderfull manner of explaing the almost impossible to explain.
I don't know what the STUFF I detect is, thats why I find it best to refer to STUFF, if I call it plasma most people have a picture of plasma far removed from what this STUFF is.
but it has similer traits to plasma.
Kevin
|
Ben
Joined:
05-11-2008
Messages: 62
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-16 11:07
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-15 21:11, cropredy wrote:
Ben,
I haven't the words or brain power to express myself clearly, but I am attempting best I can.
I cannot recommend about listening to this man more highly, he was the ultimate master of explanations, his name was father charlie Moore.
if you go to this link, then go to the audio clip called ladder of light, fast forward to 24 minutes, he explains something ever so well that I cannot. July 9th 2004.
http://www.beyondtheordinary.net/fathercharlie.shtml
I would recommend listening in full to all the words of this fabulous man.
kevin
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2008-12-15 21:13 ]
|
|
Why cant I get a straight answer form you? if your going to run around using a different terminology for words then explain yourself, if you don't then you are completely to blame of others not understanding your posts.
That link also didn't help as he to seems to be using alternative meanings of words such as energy (its either that or he simple doesn't know what he is talking about).
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5547
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-15 21:11
Ben,
I haven't the words or brain power to express myself clearly, but I am attempting best I can.
I cannot recommend about listening to this man more highly, he was the ultimate master of explanations, his name was father charlie Moore.
if you go to this link, then go to the audio clip called ladder of light, fast forward to 24 minutes, he explains something ever so well that I cannot. July 9th 2004.
http://www.beyondtheordinary.net/fathercharlie.shtml
I would recommend listening in full to all the words of this fabulous man.
kevin
[ This message was edited by: cropredy on 2008-12-15 21:13 ]
|
Ben
Joined:
05-11-2008
Messages: 62
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-15 20:44
Quote:
|
On 2008-12-15 19:18, cropredy wrote:
Ben,
I am not a school teacher, and do not intend to be held responsible for answering all your questions, find the answers yourself. |
|
My questions are about your definitions which only you can answer.. if you go around telling every one they are wrong and why using alternative meanings of words you have a responsibility of explaining them.
Quote:
| it is refreshing to discuss with someone on here who does think for themselves , and has positive input thoughts rather than nothing but the bile of many on here. |
|
My pleasure however I do disagree with you on what you see as bile.
Quote:
| I find the zero point as such, is where opposite spiral vortexs meet. |
|
do you feel this describes the same 'thing' as the standard meaning refers to only using a different theory or is it something totally different?
Quote:
| I never said anything about the aether been visable , |
|
I didn't say it was
Quote:
| it has not been dropped because it was complicated, or do you believe all you are TOLD by fairy land scientists locked down by their pensions and *****?
|
|
The funny thing is that the whole point of science is about doubting itself and not just excepting what one is told, if a scientist says something that goes against a currently excepted theory by doing good science then he/she would have nothing to fear about their job or pensions, quite the opposite in fact.
If you read up on the history of science the reason for dropping aether theories is quite clear, however it should also be very clear to anyone that adding something to a theory that is not required will make it unnecessarily more complicated so why include it?.
[ This message was edited by: Ben on 2008-12-15 20:45 ]
|
cropredy
Joined:
01-01-2006
Messages: 5547
from Oxon
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2008-12-15 19:18
Ben,
I am not a school teacher, and do not intend to be held responsible for answering all your questions, find the answers yourself.
it is refreshing to discuss with someone on here who does think for themselves , and has positive input thoughts rather than nothing but the bile of many on here.
I find the zero point as such, is where opposite spiral vortexs meet.
I never said anything about the aether been visable , it is detectable via dowsing , and that is by whatever means each individual finds most helpfull, I prefer dowsing rods , and can measure to perfection what I detect matrix lattice structure wise, hence I can then build up the patterns and can compare and compare what I find occuring where stones and constructions are placed on specific points of those patterns.
There is a consistent pattern on this forum of ridicule and negative posting, it is constant and is used to diss credit anything I post, constant twisting and additions to what I post are added and said as though fact, i suspect religious or masonic beliefs are been been tested, and are a desperate attempt to ridicule myself .
You may think that is paranoia on my behalf, but then you have not been subjected to it as long as I have.
strangely it has the opposite effect and merely drives me onwards and upwards to better comprehend this fabulous universe.
encoded in the megaliths is a history of manipulation of the aether flows, and I intend to fully comprehend all about this, but do not expect the answers to be found in a veiled science that is blind to it's presence, it has not been dropped because it was complicated, or do you believe all you are TOLD by fairy land scientists locked down by their pensions and *****?
kevin
| |
|
Main News