Featured Title: Stones Playing Cards, great gift idea |
|
| MeZolith Graphic Novel |
|
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 115 guests and 0 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Forum: Sacred Sites and Megalithic Mysteries
Moderated by : davidmorgan , TimPrevett , Andy B , Klingon , MickM , bat400 , sem , Runemage , TheCaptain
Respond to: Pagan Swastika, what D,at?
|
| Review your Reply |
vlad

Joined: 13-05-2006
Messages: 1311
from Stockholm
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-21 20:52  
I`m really having a laugh... I suppose it`s obvious that as soon as you are going to do or even think something, the Primordial Unity is broken, or what!?
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-21 16:09  
Quote:
|
On 2007-11-21 14:16, vlad wrote:
There`s no logic in myths to be found. And when "sailing" out to meet the Unknown, no a-priori assessment of dangers is possible. You`d just drown in it or start to swim.
|
|
"there's no logic in myths to be found" eh? are you being serious?
If you see logic and myth as mutually exclusive or in fact a juxtaposition then I am not suprised that to you cosmogenesis is a dualistic concept!
I think allso the Idea of a individual to 'sailing' out, who is there to sail, where is there to sail? you again impose a dualistic paradigm thereby inhibiting not only your intellectual grasp but allso your experience!
Regards
MM
|
vlad

Joined: 13-05-2006
Messages: 1311
from Stockholm
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-21 14:16  
There`s no logic in myths to be found. And when "sailing" out to meet the Unknown, no a-priori assessment of dangers is possible. You`d just drown in it or start to swim.
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-21 13:39  
Sorry Vlad,
That is absolutely avoiding what was posted, even with the side swipe it constitutes what can only be called drivel!
You are attributing dualistic paradigms that are defunct and negated by cosmogenesis!
I am not relating this to what arises from cosmogenesis, but cosmogenisis it's self.
Please if you are going to posit such opinions you must accept that when challenged a reasonable (not reiteration of misapprehensions) logical reply should be the order of the day.
Regards
MM
|
vlad

Joined: 13-05-2006
Messages: 1311
from Stockholm
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-20 14:37  
The whole set of mental tools I`ve been talking about is contained within the "box", which is called "Chinese geomancy". As for the cosmogenesis; it`s going on all the time and everywhere on all levels of the Macro- and Microcosmos.
[ This message was edited by: vlad on 2007-11-22 06:20 ]
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-20 12:11  
Quote:
|
On 2007-11-16 13:01, MuddyMick wrote:
[quote]
On 2007-11-11 08:09, vlad wrote:
Swastikas are potent symbols, anchored in the broader sensing capabilities of the underconscious mind. Clockwise swastika is yang,
|
|
Hi Vlad,
ying yang?
I cannot see your reasoning at all!
Wether cockwise or anti they represent cosmogenesis the emergence from emptiness, as the initial emergent there is no left to judge right, no up to a down, no ying to a yang, to impose your dualistic paradigm is both ridiculous and defunct!
Regards
MM
[/quote]
Hi Vlad,
Ignore the cockwise etc
In all seriousness do you have no response to your misapprehension of cosmogenesis symbology?
regards
MM
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-19 11:28  
Rewgards
this is gettung worsse
NN
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-19 11:26  
Quote:
|
On 2007-11-16 17:47, BERNARDQUATERMASS wrote:
Kevin...........MM made two spelling mistakes, what they used to call a Freudian slip, (very apt). A WETHER is a castrated ram, and is followed COCKWISE.
LOL.
|
|
OOOOps
Sorry about the spelling
A genuine mistake
I was in a rush
Rewgards
MM
|
MuddyMick

Joined: 12-05-2006
Messages: 1237
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-19 11:23  
Quote:
|
On 2007-11-17 22:59, vlad wrote:
Well, guys. It`s simply like making a picture of the Unknown using three colours. Say, red for yin, blue for yang and green for their
"offspring". To keep the picture in touch with a dowsable reality,
you should first use converging yang-lines. After you`ve traced a
centre on a map, make another separate picture, starting from the centre outwards. Those two views are not so easy to coordinate with one another. But this is the only feasible way to reduce a 3D (or rather more like 4D or even 8D in Chinese geomancy) structure - e.g. an ellipsoid, to a 2D picture, combined from those two.
|
|
this does not answer the statement!and fails to deal with the inherent misapprehension of your previous post.
MM
|
BERNARDQUATERMASS

Joined: 19-03-2006
Messages: 653
from Oldham, Lancashire
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2007-11-18 15:43  
Mike Croley said.............
work on a building site Mick, can't wait for next summer to show of my Swastika. Prince, (The real lizard boy) Charles is on site on Monday, could be a giggle.
mike
Well Mike, how did it go?
| |
|