The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
Festival of British Archaeology Events
Stonehenge Summer Solstice 2013
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Wayland's Smithy

Featured Title:
Free book with orders of £10 or over in our shop
Free book with orders of £10 or over in our shop

MeZolith Graphic Novel
MeZolith Graphic Novel

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 96 guests and 2 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Forum:  Portal Talking Shop
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , sem , Klingon , coldrum , bat400 , TheCaptain , Runemage , SolarMegalith , davidmorgan Respond to:  Getting better photos
Preferences Registered Users You can Post new messages or replies to this Forum
NickName
Password
Message Icon                 
                
                
                
                
                
    
Message

HTML : On
BBCode : On

Click to add Smilies into your Message:

:-):-(:-D;-):-08-):-?:-P:-|:-|:-|:-|

Click to add BBCode to your Message:



   

Review your Reply
davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2009-02-04 00:45   
HDR is definitely a good tool, I'm using a free trial of Photomatix - I reckon I'll pay the fee (99 US$).
Both these pictures were hand held. (You need a special licence from INAH to use a tripod at Mexican sites, apparently).




Strangely, with my new camera, I don't seem to be able to take photos horizontally properly - I keep having to rotate the image by 1 degree to the right!

[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2009-02-04 11:38 ]

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2009-01-13 14:54   
Now I want a Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC. (Dreaming).
Nice photo here taken with this lens.

P.S. I'm often entertained by the sponsored link ads on the MP, this time I see a camera (obviously), but I remember having seen a gall stones removal advert once.

[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2009-01-14 00:02 ]

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2008-12-12 11:33   
The CHDK is part of my kite-cam plan (one day). But you're right about it's usefulness in HDR - you could run any script you liked, changing exposure for limitless frames. Worth looking into as a cheaper alternative.

I see a Canon Powershot S3 IS is a third of the price of the 450D.
Forget that, a Powershot A570 is only £55, run it till the "Non Rechargeable AA" batteries run out.

I'm thinking anaglyphs now.
Here's a nice one.


[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2008-12-12 15:01 ]

h_fenton



Joined:
22-10-2005


Messages: 105
from OXFORDSHIRE, UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2008-12-11 20:04   
david, if you have a canon compact which is CHDK capable you could load a script to do all the bracketing you could dream of. you might also be able to fool the camera into doing a 64second exposure for those night shots

H

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2008-12-11 13:25   
Right, I'm getting into HDR photography. I'm going to buy a Canon 450D which can do 3 bracketed frames over a maximum range of 4 EV steps (is that the same as f-stops?) - here's a list of cameras with their bracketing abilities. And also the Photomatix software. That should get me started. With the camera you get control software, so I'll probably work up to attaching a laptop in order to get many frames.
I was very impressed by Tony Partington's HDR video, looks like quite a lot of work went into that, maybe there's some batch processing technique.

"Unfortunately, three shots spaced by one EV are often not sufficient for properly taking HDR scenes."
Oh dear, is 3 shots at two EV ok?


[ This message was edited by: davidmorgan on 2008-12-11 13:35 ]

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2008-04-08 10:06   
I'm very impressed by the standard of some of the recent pictures. I was wondering about HDR. Does one have to set up a programmed sequence of bracketed exposures and then let the camera click away?
Thus avoiding any camera movement when changing the exposure.

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2007-02-23 21:59   
I wonder if you could get rid of the noise by doing a bit a post-production interferometry like astronomers do. You'd need a dark baseline image I guess.

sem



Joined:
12-11-2003


Messages: 1722
from Bridgend,S.Wales

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2007-02-23 21:11   
Hi Jim
Just a quick explanation of the film speed thing.
Digi cameras record the image on a CCD (Charge-Coupled Device), the electrical eqivalent of film.
If you increase the power through a CCD it becomes more sensitive, and picks up more detail plus more electrical "noise."
The two things are not the same but the effects on a picture are very similar.
Cheers
Sem


JimChampion



Joined:
30-12-2004


Messages: 398
from Southampton

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2007-02-23 13:04   
Quote:
Unfortunately my digital compact doesn't have those exposure times or f-stop capability.



Neither did my old one. My current camera cost less than 200 pounds, isn't a DSLR but does have useful 'creative' features like being able to select f-stop, shutter speed or both. (And while we're on the subject does anyone know how the hell a digital camera can have an "ISO" setting? I thought that was to do with graininess of the film in olde-fashioned cameras?).

davidmorgan



Joined:
23-11-2006


Messages: 1620
from The New Forest

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2007-02-23 11:07   
Another thing - has anyone tried converting slides using a digital camera? I've tried slide scanners and they come out badly.

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.