On 2007-01-10 13:06, cropredy wrote:
Rbatham,
I dont want to learn anything that is not in accordance with what I find in nature.
A classic of this , is counting in tens.
I prefer to count in nines.
You and me have a better chance than many others of thinking in such numbers as we were brought up counting in twelves.
If you count in nines, then you are following a descending sequence;-
9
18
27
36
45
54
63
72
81
90
and an ascending coloum, everything I detect spirals into a point and spirals back out from the same point.
You have been led to look at space in a linear fashion, it simply will not exist as you comprehend it.
This leads to completely wrong vision of reality.
It is difficult to think in nines and spirals that are all encompassing not just two dimensional, as when looking at a drawing.
I therefore deduce that time actually wraps around all the spiral pathways , and all time past and in the future is accessable.
It is all just an electrical field, with zillions of interlocking such.
To actually travel about in this , and pass through these interlocking spirals, we will simply have to stand still.
We are on the good ship earth, hurtling along through space, following a descending spiral you consider time, If we were able to stop the planet, or create a small planet in the shape of a globe with its own field been created in the same way as the planet does, then we would watch the planet dissappear fast, to those on the planet it would appear as though our new little world had travelled, we could then skip about the zillions of spirals and appear anywhere at any time.
This is in the not too distant future as far as your time spiral is concerned, and we will possibly keep popping back to make sure certain things happen that need to happen.
When they are going into space in a rocket, they are fighting nature, they have to rip through the consequences of nature.
Instead of this, just copy nature .
To do this you have to recognise nature and its ways, nature does not count in tens.
Kevin

On 2007-01-10 13:06, cropredy wrote:
Rbatham,

I prefer to count in nines.



18
27
36
45
54
63
72
81
90

Kevin

But if 'time' is man's invention, then it should have no physical effect on any matter, hence the natural vibration of that matter should remain constant, and further hence we should see a difference in the number of vibration cycles in, for example the period between sunrise and sunset. So, to be honest, I see utterly no supporting evidence for time getting faster except the usual psycological effect that increasing age has had on mankind since whenever (days always seem shorter now than when you were a kid), and Mike/Croppy's unverifiable assertions.

Do crystals have supernatural powers, eh, no they don't. They do have the piezo-electric effect though!

On 2007-01-10 20:47, Aluta wrote:
[quote]

You're right tho' aluta, the 'Quickening' affects everything within the matrix of our 5 sense reallity, that includes crystals.

You're right tho' aluta, the 'Quickening' affects everything within the matrix of our 5 sense reallity, that includes crystals.

On 2007-01-10 18:58, Sanchez wrote:
[quote]
On 2007-01-10 18:37, waterbouy wrote:

You got that the wrong way round!

On 2007-01-10 18:37, waterbouy wrote:

You got that the wrong way round!

On 2007-01-10 14:27, Aluta wrote:
[quote]
There is no reason why the natural vibration of crystals would change if time altered.

On 2007-01-10 07:31, Sanchez wrote:
[quote]
On 2007-01-10 04:20, rbatham wrote:

There is no reason why the natural vibration of crystals would change if time altered. It would be detectable. As I said before astronomers would soon detect any change. The stars are the true time keepers not the sun.