Featured Title:
Pictures from the Past: Art and Symbols of the Neolithic and Bronze Age |
 |
| Solving Stonehenge, the new key to an ancient enigma |
 |
| Login |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page. |
| Who's Online |
There are currently, 114 guests and 1 members online.
You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here |
| |
Forum: Stones Forum
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , coldrum , Klingon , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith , sem
Respond to: Arbor Low (again)
|
| Review your Reply |
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
 OFF-Line
|  New Message Posted!2006-08-16 18:49
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-15 23:23, cromlech wrote:
u r just killing this forum with ur personnal useless fights, not even related to the topic.
moderators can u do something?
Arbor low is a fascinating topic... not users fights... 
|
|
Aren't you the one to call fellow Portal members neo nazis?
[Posted 16-08-2006 at 00:02 cromlech wrote:
[looks like this forum is being taken over by nazis...they have always been interested in the secret power of our sacred monumnets... didn't hitler himself finance researches on the topic...]
Maybe the moderators will pay you your deserved attention! 
mike
|
cromlech
Joined:
10-02-2006
Messages: 116
OFF-Line
|  New Message Posted!2006-08-15 23:23
u r just killing this forum with ur personnal useless fights, not even related to the topic.
moderators can u do something?
Arbor low is a fascinating topic... not users fights...
|
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-11 15:52
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-11 08:59, Salopian wrote:
PS, to clarify:
"Nigel was refering to my ATTITUDE not my behaviour."
Only towards chalking swastikas on protected stones. Your admission that you bury crystals at scheduled sites, knowing its against the rules, illustrates that your BEHAVIOUR is less than acceptable to most people.
That being so, Mithra and anyone else is perfectly justified in having grave suspicions towards you with regard to the chalked swastikas that keep appearing at your local site.
I trust that clarifies my position. Goodbye again.
|
|
Just as long as they remain SUSPICIONS Nigel, we'll all be happy.
Take care
mike 
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-11 08:59
PS, to clarify:
"Nigel was refering to my ATTITUDE not my behaviour."
Only towards chalking swastikas on protected stones. Your admission that you bury crystals at scheduled sites, knowing its against the rules, illustrates that your BEHAVIOUR is less than acceptable to most people.
That being so, Mithra and anyone else is perfectly justified in having grave suspicions towards you with regard to the chalked swastikas that keep appearing at your local site.
I trust that clarifies my position. Goodbye again.
|
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 21:31
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-10 21:03, mithra wrote:
[quote]
On 2006-08-10 20:40, Salopian wrote:
''That's absolutely all the megalithic community needed to know about you. I'm glad it now does.''
Quite! What atrocious behaviour! I suppose the lizard use to draw on walls as a baby and now, as a child, does this. Pathetic and vile attention seeking!
And it's bye-bye from me too. Mithra.
|
|
Can you read? Is English your first language?
Behaviour? Nigel was refering to my ATTITUDE not my behaviour.
Give me strength! Please, do go away.
|
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 21:18
[quote]
On 2006-08-10 20:40, Salopian wrote:
"Anything else bothering you Nigel?"
No.
We've now got as much of the truth as we're ever likely to I suspect. Nevertheless, I'm particularly gratified that you have now publicly demonstrated that your attitude to the act of chalking on protected scheduled monuments is less than condemnatory.
That's absolutely all the megalithic community needed to know about you. I'm glad it now does.
Goodbye Mike.
That's all 'they' may have needed to know Nigel, but they've learnt a hell of a lot more, as have you.
I too am a part of your little community, I'd suggest you start to recognize and accept that fact. Them there stones be mine too you know.
Take it easy my friend
mike
|
mithra
Joined:
27-06-2006
Messages: 562
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 21:03
[quote]
On 2006-08-10 20:40, Salopian wrote:
''That's absolutely all the megalithic community needed to know about you. I'm glad it now does.''
Quite! What atrocious behaviour! I suppose the lizard use to draw on walls as a baby and now, as a child, does this. Pathetic and vile attention seeking!
And it's bye-bye from me too. Mithra.
|
Salopian
Joined:
12-06-2006
Messages: 241
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 20:40
"Anything else bothering you Nigel?"
No.
We've now got as much of the truth as we're ever likely to I suspect. Nevertheless, I'm particularly gratified that you have now publicly demonstrated that your attitude to the act of chalking on protected scheduled monuments is less than condemnatory.
That's absolutely all the megalithic community needed to know about you. I'm glad it now does.
Goodbye Mike.
|
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 18:42
[[quote]
On 2006-08-10 07:58, Salopian wrote:
"You can include your numerous accounts of site desecration there too, something else I've constantly denied."
Personally, i don't recall saying you do anything that you haven't yourself said you do. Perhaps now would be a good time for you to clarify exactly what you do and what you don't and what you think is acceptable. For instance, have you left things at sites or buried crystals at them?]
Yes Nige', as you know, I have Crystals buried at Avebury, Stonehenge and at my own Circle. ALL come fron one large piece.
[Do you approve of the actions of the person that chalks backwards swastikas on the stones at your local site, Nine Stones, or not?]
I'd have to talk that person before I could answer that Nigel but, it looks pretty harmless to me. It's still visible even now and I like it very much.
[Here are just the latest instances that I know of -
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/43239
http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/43238]
The Swastika on the ground is mine and I don't recall the white blob on the stone.
[http://www.themodernantiquarian.com/post/46709]
Have you not read the response to Jamie Stones posting? http://www.heritageaction.org/?page=theheritagejournal&id=144
Anything else bothering you Nigel?
mike
|
flatcap
Joined:
28-05-2006
Messages: 268
from UK
OFF-Line
| New Message Posted!2006-08-10 18:05
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-10 12:57, Ben_Blackshaw wrote:
RE: The Swastika
I've revised my opinion, I can see both sides of the arguments so I'm sitting on the fence on this one.
It is a beautiful symbol though.
|
|
Hi Ben, I can't find the words to express what I feel when I see the Swastika. To work with it is quite an experience!
mike
| |
|
Main News