The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

moggridge1869

Featured Title:
Stone Circle Greetings Cards
Stone Circle Greetings Cards

A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl
A Guide to Stone Circles (New Edition), Aubrey Burl

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 87 guests and 0 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Forum:  General Forum
Moderated by : Andy B , TimPrevett , Klingon , sem , MickM , TheCaptain , bat400 , coldrum , davidmorgan , Runemage , SolarMegalith Respond to:  What happened?
Preferences Registered Users You can Post new messages or replies to this Forum
NickName
Password
Message Icon                 
                
                
                
                
                
    
Message

HTML : On
BBCode : On

Click to add Smilies into your Message:

:-):-(:-D;-):-08-):-?:-P:-|:-|:-|:-|

Click to add BBCode to your Message:



   

Review your Reply
Andy B



Joined:
13-02-2001


Messages: 7001
from Surrey, UK

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 13:40   
OK I think this thread has run its course, it's starting to repeat itself.
Next Subject please!

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 13:40   
Well done Anonymous for being 'helpful' to Cropredy. Perhaps you could help the rest of us by telling us how exactly you were 'helpful'. Then we can judge whether you are 'helpful' or otherwise.

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 13:14   
I wonder how many of those that have helped you in the past would do so now Kevin?

I have helped you, and have never slagged you off, but would not help you again.

In addition, despite being a total Megarack, my usage of this portal has been in decline for quite some time, and looks set to continue. This is because of the negative aggitation that definately eminates from this site.

Keep it up by all means and watch us walk away, noe by one. Then you can be happy I guess.



cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 09:22   
In the past I have suggested that the anonymous, facility should be removed, but on reflection, and following this thread,I can see the sense and positive use of it.
This whole fiasco started on a thread on TMA, about freedom of speech, where phoenix ( me, in a cunning disguise , posted a comment about the starman, and how he had come to be banned, and commented about the owner of TMA, walking about wearing swatikas( which he has every right to, and I am sure for the best of reasons)
In no way was there anything offensive said, and no comments at all about the evil dowsing word.
The thread was all about the owner of TMA , and an article where he had made several quotes , the discussion was about everyones right to have their opinions and right to say them .
The thread suddenly disapeared, and I then found it re-appeared minus the post from phoenix, when I then tried to re-post, I found that I couldn't, and the message came up informing me that I couldn't due to miss-use ?
I would remind you that the thread was about freedom of speech, in no way was phoenix offensive, and had been posting on other threads with no problem, and was never going to mention the dreaded dowsing word, because if phoenix had done, he had a good idea what would have happened ?
So I agree with anonymous.
Cobblers.
Kevin

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 06:45   
As Ken Williams says, the TMA threads are still there. No-one was banned because of their beliefs, only for their behaviour.

For those that can't be bothered to look Starman appeared under at least 10 different user names, hijacked every other thread and caused loads of people to move away from the forum. What was the forum supposed to do? Well guess what? He DIDN'T get banned for that, he got banned for being disgustingly abusive to a forum member.

The "suppression of freedom of speech" thing is garbage - in your case as well Kevin. You refused to avoid hijacking every other thread with YOUR version of reality so discussions suffered. If you'd exercised restraint and kept your ideas to a few threads, you'd still be there and welcome.

You're at it again here, see "Alignments and magnetic anomalies". You keep saying "its hard not to keep mentioning my stuff" in the top forum. No it's not. Just don't. I don't see why you should re-write TMA history about the reason you got banned there whilst demonstrating the true reason here.

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-26 06:14   
Quote:

On 2006-05-25 21:45, KenWilliams wrote:
Kevin, how may times and in how many ways does it has to be said, when you were banned it was nothing to do with freedom of speech and everything to do with behaviour. You were free to say what you liked for months and months, it was when your behaviour became a problem for other forum users that you put yourself in that position. No one was truly bothered about what you said, it was the way you went about saying it, especially when it got personal.



COBBLERS!

KenWilliams



Joined:
12-04-2005


Messages: 188
from Dublin

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2006-05-25 21:45   
Kevin, how may times and in how many ways does it has to be said, when you were banned it was nothing to do with freedom of speech and everything to do with behaviour. You were free to say what you liked for months and months, it was when your behaviour became a problem for other forum users that you put yourself in that position. No one was truly bothered about what you said, it was the way you went about saying it, especially when it got personal.

cropredy



Joined:
01-01-2006


Messages: 5539
from Oxon

OFF-Line

 New Message Posted!2006-05-25 21:22   
Anonymoose, aka, anonymouse, I really appreciate been able to talk to you on this site.
However we may agree or disagree, we are allowed to talk.
Without freedom of speech, we may as well have let our nazi enemy march straight in here.
They burn't the books and information that they didn't agree with.
They could say anything , without fear of answer, because anyone who answered back was exterminated.
Things are been said on another site that those that have been exterminated , have no way of answering.
Do we never learn from our past mistakes?
Freedom of speech
Freedom of speech
Kevin

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-25 20:24   
As the 'original' Anonymous poster of this thread, I would like to point out that I am not associated with the last three Anonymous posts. Just who are these people pretending to be me ...

Anonymous


User not Registered
 New Message Posted!2006-05-25 19:50   
yawn, yawn...zzzzz

IMPORTANT NOTES: This site uses COOKIES. Please do not use this web site if you do not agree to our Terms and Conditions of use.
If you plan to visit ancient sites in person, please make sure you follow our Charter.

What's New Browse by Country Add a new Site Join our Society New in the Shop About Us
Feature Articles Browse by Site Type Your own page email Newsletter Follow us on Twitter Terms and Conditions
Book Reviews Accessible Sites Your visit log Google Earth Be a Facebook friend Contact Editor
Latest Photos Top Rated Sites Submit News / Article Google Street View Downloads and ebooks Site Privacy Policy
Main News Forum Latest New Images Find nearby sites Search Page Main News

Articles, photographs and comments are the property of their respective authors or contributors, please contact them for permission to reproduce. Site design ©1997-2012 Andy Burnham.