The Megalithic Portal
 
Latest EntriesFind a SiteJoin InNews & LinksForumShopAbout Us  Login / New account
Main Menu
News  ·   Forum
Browse by Country/Type
About us/Help/FAQ
Your Own Page
Your Visit Log
email Newsletter
Join our Society
Contact Editor
Site Search
spionage kamera Appunti, Riassunti @ TruCheck Referaty @ Referat.Mirslovarei.com

Random Image

Ta Prohm

Featured Title:
Redhead, the new thriller by Ian Cook 'a compulsive read'
Redhead, the new thriller by Ian Cook 'a compulsive read'

Kilmartin Guide
Kilmartin Guide

Login
User ID

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like your own home page, fewer ads, and your contributions link to your page.

Who's Online
There are currently, 136 guests and 5 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsored Links

More Choices
Contribute to our running costs
Webrings
Open Directory: Megaliths
Megalithic Mysteries
Our Online Shop


Comment Post

Re: London Stone (Score: 1)
by Rombald on Monday, 13 February 2006

I quote from Ralph Merrifield's "Roman London" (Cassell, London, 1969, pp. 95-7):

On the southern side of the ancient [Roman] road, and therefore beneath the middle of the present street, just to the east of Cannon Street Station, there stood in the Middle Ages a mysterious stone monument which, at least as early as the twelfth centruy, was known simply as London Stone [footnote to an 1189 reference]. ...
In 1742 the worn stump, which had been for some time protected by a stone cover, was removed to the north side of the street, and in 1798 it was set in a stone case in the south external wall of St. Swithin's Church. The church was destroyed by bombing in the war and the Stone was removed when the ruined wall was demolished in 1961. It was found to be merely the rounded apex of the monument, made of Clipsham Limestone and shaped rather like a tea-cosy. ... the anceint fetish stone of London ...
... Since it is not a natural monolith, but a monument shaped by masons from quarried stone, it is unlikely that it is a pagan Saxon sacred stone ... It was certainly not a wayside cross of te Christian Saxon period, since in that case some memory would have been preserved in its name. ... Its Roman origin has been doubted because it is of Clipsham Stone, an oolitic limestone which was extensively used for building in East Anglia in the Middle Ages. We do not kow that this stone was exploited to any extent during the Roman period ...


Something is not right. This message is just to keep things from messing up down the road