Featured: Ark of Secrets - Neolithic spirit alive in the Middle Ages

Ark of Secrets - Neolithic spirit alive in the Middle Ages

Random Image


Skamby Jættestue

Megaliths, Stones of Memory

Megaliths, Stones of Memory

Who's Online

There are currently, 219 guests and 0 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsors

<< Feature Articles >> Social History of the Standing Stone

Submitted by Thorgrim on Saturday, 03 September 2005  Page Views: 12207

Other Archaeology
Old Man of Gugh
Old Man of Gugh submitted by Thorgrim : The Old Man of Gugh (Vote or comment on this photo)
When stalking that remote standing stone or framing it in your viewfinder – have you ever wondered why it’s there? I mean – not why it’s there in that particular place, but why it’s there at all. Why did ancient man erect standing stones and why do we still do it? Headshrinks would say that it’s phallic and that’s that – but is it? What is the social history of the standing stone?

How did the erection of standing stones start and are they found all over the world? There are massive standing stones (obelisks) more than 70 feet tall in Egypt and some even taller in Ethiopia. Madagascar, Easter Island, the Mediterranean islands, mainland Europe, Asia and Africa all have standing stones in one form or another so that suggests a universal desire to erect them, but why? Standing stones or menhirs barely get a mention in the literature whereas there is endless speculation about stone circles, stone rows, henges and cursus. There they are, all on their lonesome declaring a lost message and pointing to what or where we know not. Were the first standing stones natural boulders that were later dressed and moved? Did wooden poles, posts or stakes precede them? Leaving aside those stones that are part of circles and rows, does the secret of the solitary standing stone lie closer to us than we realise?

What are the various functions that a single standing stone could perform? Did a standing stone mark a tribal boundary or was it a waymark? Could it be a tribal totem pole? Does it mark the grave of a hero; commemorate a battle or perhaps a treaty? No one seems to be asking these questions so why shouldn’t I? If we look for understanding by limiting ourselves to the British Neolithic, we may not get very far. Are there parallels from other times and other places that may help us? If a wooden post was indeed the precursor of the standing stone (and it would have to be in stone less areas like East Anglia) then our first parallel is the carved and painted totem poles of North America. Can we see a legitimate possibility of a parallel here? Were our standing stones ever carved and painted? Did they embody tribal totems and identity? Were they set up in the centre of the village? There is some evidence for this in that the standing stone recently excavated at Stansted Airport was found buried in a pit in a Bronze Age village. We know that the stone based religions of the Neolithic underwent a change in the late Bronze Age and by the Iron Age the water cult was all important with very many votive offerings being cast into rivers, streams, wells and ponds. Did the Bronze Age people of Stansted bury their standing stone because it was no longer politically correct?

Were standing stones set up as boundary markers to show people where one tribal area ended and another began? Were they, in effect, “Keep Out” notices? Endowed with powers by the local shaman, perhaps they were feared as spirit markers as well. Or could stones have been helpful rather than prohibitive? Were they set up to guide travellers along trade routes, marking fords and safe crossings over rivers and across treacherous marshes? Anyone lost today in a moorland mist, knows the comfort of finding walkers’ cairns and the Dartmoor stone crosses are a lifesaver when the fog comes down. Is this a real clue at last? Did the stone crosses that were set up to mark the way for Christian pilgrims evolve from standing stones? Certainly some were made from standing stones ( Bennet’s Cross ). Roman standing stones were used not only to mark the way, but also to tell the traveller how far he had to go. They were called milestones and we have only just replaced them with metal ones. The Romans also set up stones as grave markers and memorials. That practice continued well after the Romans went home and Latin inscribed stones like Men Scryfa
continued into the so-called Dark Ages.

The Picts carved wonderful designs on to stone slabs - pagan at first and then Christian. Early Christian crosses were carved onto slabs of natural stone and later, stone crosses were erected – the free standing high crosses. Were these free standing stone crosses the direct descendants of the Neolithic standing stones? They seem to perform the same functions. They embody the Christian totem – Christ and the crucifixion. The Vikings carved serpents, dragons, Odin, Thor and Christ all mixed up on their standing stones and crosses such as the Gosforth Cross . We have already seen that stone crosses acted as guideposts on pilgrimage routes and some were certainly boundary markers to show the extent of monastic land. We still have stone gravestones of course so that is another similar function.

Perhaps the key to understanding the functions of standing stones lies in evolution and current practice. So we can surmise that standing stones evolved into Christian stone crosses ( Rudston our tallest standing stone means “cross stone” – rood was the Anglo-Saxon word for a cross and so perhaps that standing stone later had a cross added to it). Stone crosses evolved into preaching crosses, then into market crosses and finally into war memorials. Not all of our war memorials are crosses, of course – some, like London’s Cenotaph, resemble standing stones. All functions present and correct there then. So we still erect standing stones as graves and war memorials and even special way markers like the Meridian Obelisk on Pole Hill. In Somerset, they erected some beautifully carved standing stones at Glastonbury, Wells and elsewhere to mark the Millennium. It does seem that we still feel the need to erect stones to mark important places and events. They are durable and intended to outlast those that erect them. When we place a modern standing stone, we are surely leaving a message for future generations. Hasn’t it always been that way or have we just got a 5,000-year-old phallic fixation that won’t go away? I’ll leave you to make up your own minds.


<< The Great Stone Circles – How they Work Part 8

Autumn Photography Challenge >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Chariot of the Soul by Linda Proud - a compelling tale of Britain, Rome and one man

Chariot of the Soul by Linda Proud - a compelling tale of Britain, Rome and one man

Sponsors

Auto-Translation (Google)

Translate from English into:

"Social History of the Standing Stone" | Login/Create an Account | 8 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Thursday, 11 January 2018
In a series of essays and books (Solstice Trackways & Ancient Pathways) the local researcher and archivist Frank Parker has suggested that the megaliths, stone crosses and ancient tracks found in Derbyshire were the work of a Bronze Age migration of Phoenician and Egyptian tribes. For a variety of reasons which I shall explain in due course I am inclined to agree with many of his conclusions and theories. The predominant interest for these tribes was the abundance of metal ores (copper, lead and silver) found in the region. These mercantile tribes found sources of tin, lead, copper and gold in other parts of the British Isles namely Cornwall, S. Ireland, Wales and some parts of Scotland. Over a long period of time they were able to influence significantly the culture, economy, landscape and religion of the indigenous peoples. Traces of their activity and occupation of these regions remain as subtle vestiges in the language, traditions, myths and legends and their true origins lost in the mists of time. The Phoenicians were a mercantile, seafaring branch of the Canaanites and Philistines who had long established themselves in the region now known to us as Lebanon around 3,000 BC. The ancient Hebrews came into close contact with the Phoenicians and Canaanites who greatly influenced their own Judaic cosmology and beliefs. The Phoenicians inhabited the numerous coastal regions, set up convenient ports or urban centres and went on to establish trading colonies on the neighbouring islands of Tyre, and Aradus and also in the coastal districts of Ugarit, (Ras Shamra), Antaradus (Tartus), Marathus (Amrit), Simyra, Botrys, Byblos, Sidon, and Akko. Although ostensibly small, independent kingdoms they were over time under the direct influence and protection of the Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians and Hittites who became dependent on them for raw materials.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Monday, 04 November 2013
There logically would be near as many reasons as there are standing stones. Some questions are just not well-formed.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by kunjethy on Thursday, 24 November 2011
(User Info | Send a Message)
It is indeed astonishing that in discussions of the standing stone and even stone crosses the ubiquitous ancient rock crosses of Kerala India find no place. Students of the obelisk, totems, axis of the world and others interested in rock monuments would do well to take a look at the stone open air or outdoor crosses so abundant in the early churches of the Syriac or Thomas Christian Churches. This may very well be compared to the Coptic use of the stone cross. More at This is a link
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Monday, 02 February 2009
Hi,
I am living in Normandie at the moment,and close by me is a megalyth, Menhir
or carved granite stone. I have searched in vain for another like it. The stone is
carved? into a four-sided cross, it is difficult to describe, two actual crosses form two
further sister crosses. I am a sculptor and since living in Normandie have worked with granite, my is that stuff hard and tricky. Even with contemporary tools I would find the making of this cross impossible, so as fascinating as the meaning of these things ,for me is how?, how did they make something as complex as this, what
did those ancient people know about material that is not known to us.?
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Saturday, 08 October 2005
In this part of the world - South Pembrokeshire - there are few if any trees and so standing stones have been set up, usually in the centres of fields, to act as nothing more esoterical than cattle scratching posts. john.jukes@virgin.net
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Monday, 12 September 2005
Thorgrim,
This was a nice little article. Sensibly, you suggest possibilities rather than trot out some crackpot theory as if fact.
For what it's worth, I believe that the erection (no phallic pun intended) of standing stones has multiple origins/purposes. Ultimately, though, I feel that there is a religious element, and also an artistic one. They often provide focus and proportion in a landscape. What I find really encouraging in all this is the idea - mentioned by you - that they are erected with the consciousness that they will long outlast the 'erector(s)'. In our blinkered, materialistic, myopic western world, - as if we don't EXPECT humanity to persist much longer - what a refreshing concept! As a symbol of the impulse to look beyond the present, and to act for and on behalf of future generations, standing stones are still pointing the way for humankind ....
Sorry I went on so.

Phil Ryder
Folsom California

PS Look out for my new novel 'Milburga's Well' which has a megalithic stone circle at its 'nerve centre'.
philburga2003@yahoo.com
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by nicoladidsbury on Tuesday, 06 September 2005
(User Info | Send a Message)
Thanks for you thought provoking article Thorgrim.
Every stone I visit makes me wonder on it's origin, the thought processes that went through the originators' heads, the whys, and the hows.
[ Reply to This ]

Re: Social History of the Standing Stone by Anonymous on Tuesday, 06 September 2005
Very difficult Thorgrim, I,m faced with the same problem with two granite stones here, one at a Neolithic site here has
engravings on the dressed side which does correspond with distant peaks and a river, so its a map, the other at a Mesolithic site is blank, but with one side smoothed over, my interpretation is that it was used for cleaning skins. Arthur, Burbage, Leic,s.
[ Reply to This ]

Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.