Featured: Friendly specialist tours to ancient, mystical and historical sites in the UK and beyond

Friendly specialist tours to ancient, mystical and historical sites in the UK and beyond

Monuments and Landscape in Atlantic Europe, Scarre

Monuments and Landscape in Atlantic Europe, Scarre

Who's Online

There are currently, 422 guests and 3 members online.

You are a guest. To join in, please register for free by clicking here

Sponsors

<< Our Photo Pages >> Motza Neolithic City - Ancient Village or Settlement in Israel

Submitted by motist on Tuesday, 16 July 2019  Page Views: 1196

Neolithic and Bronze AgeSite Name: Motza Neolithic City
Country: Israel
NOTE: This site is 3.568 km away from the location you searched for.

Type: Ancient Village or Settlement
Nearest Town: mevaseret tzion
Latitude: 31.797183N  Longitude: 35.144346E
Condition:
5Perfect
4Almost Perfect
3Reasonable but with some damage
2Ruined but still recognisable as an ancient site
1Pretty much destroyed, possibly visible as crop marks
0No data.
-1Completely destroyed
3 Ambience:
5Superb
4Good
3Ordinary
2Not Good
1Awful
0No data.
no data Access:
5Can be driven to, probably with disabled access
4Short walk on a footpath
3Requiring a bit more of a walk
2A long walk
1In the middle of nowhere, a nightmare to find
0No data.
4 Accuracy:
5co-ordinates taken by GPS or official recorded co-ordinates
4co-ordinates scaled from a detailed map
3co-ordinates scaled from a bad map
2co-ordinates of the nearest village
1co-ordinates of the nearest town
0no data
4

Internal Links:
External Links:

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist : Motza Neolithic City (Vote or comment on this photo)
Ancient Village or Settlement in Israel

9,000-year-old Neolithic City Discovered in Jerusalem Valley.

People were still transitioning from hunting-gathering to farming when this vast town with stone houses and red-floored gathering sites arose by Jerusalem, and finally, began to appreciate children

A sprawling, prosperous Neolithic village dated to 9,000 years ago has been discovered in Motza, at the foot of the Jerusalem hills. The site, featuring dozens of stone houses, grander buildings that may have been temples, and skeletal remains was discovered serendipitously during works ahead of building a new road. Belying thoughts that prehistoric settlements didn’t have enough “culture” to grow anywhere near that large, the village seems to have supported around a thousand people at its heyday. It was about 500 meters in length, which isn’t much smaller than the modern village of Abu Ghosh nearby. However, it was mysteriously abandoned after about 400 years and would only arise anew 5,000 years later, in the era of Roman control over the land.
Israelis know the site where this village was found all too well: it’s right at the dangerous hairpin bend on the main highway between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem that has finally been replaced by a bridge.The serendipitous discovery of the village adds to one found not far, in Shuafat, dating to 7,000 years. There too the archaeologists found stone houses that had been in use for at least hundreds of years.
Red temple floors
The Neolithic villagers made their stone bricks crudely, using flint tools, and apparently rammed wooden stakes into cracks in the natural rock to break it. The stone bricks were cemented with mud, which means that every time the winter rainy season came around, the walls would need maintenance. The town was built at the confluence of two streams.


Motza, amidst the Jerusalem hills: People have now been living there for over 9,000 years. Emil salman
These village builders 9,000 years ago were among the early adopters of a settled lifestyle. Though some stabs at cultivation clearly began in the Levant at least 23,000 years ago, it would take millennia before people transitioned more firmly from hunting and gathering for subsistence to farming. The Motza site isn’t the only huge settlement from that time, Dr Hamoudi Khalaily from the Antiquities Authority told Haaretz. “There are others, mainly in Jordan, but none have been thoroughly excavated,” he says. There are also some in Israel itself, including in the once-marshy Hula valley.
“Neolithic settlements were flourishing at the time,” Khalaily explains. The people who had passed the point of scrabbling subsistence from gathered grains and hunted rats; they had the leisure to build not only houses of stone, but public places featuring a more monumental type of construction, which the archaeologists found in this Motza site as well.
We can only speculate what the ancient people got up to in these public places, but sheer care in the workmanship is indicative of a deep respect. Domestic houses in which the hoi polloi lived didn’t have particularly invested flooring beyond dirt or basic plaster. The public places in prehistoric Motza had better plastering, colored red, Khalaily says.
The archaeologists also found differences in the tool assemblages in the homes and the public places, further indicating that something special was going on there. Happily for our peace of mind, whatever else that red color might suggest, the excavators didn’t find signs of violence, Khalaily reassures. Also, people seem to have long since discovered worship, as attested by sites such as the famous 12,000-year old site of Gobekli Tepe in Anatolia, across the Mediterranean from Israel, which some call the world's first temple". Khalaily for one is comfortable speculating that specially invested edifices featuring specially invested flooring and tools served some religious purpose, that could have gone back a very long way.
Humans arise
The fertile Motza valley seems to have been occupied since the dawn of modern human existence. This Neolithic village may well have been the largest nearby center of human activity in the area at its time, Khalaily says.
Organic findings show the early Motza dwellers ate of the gazelle, boar, badgers, hares and any rodent they could catch. They also ate sheep, goats, pigs and cows, which were at least partially domesticated. At the time, people were still transiting from a subsistence based on hunting and gathering, to farming. The domestication of both plants and animals was very much still a work in progress. For example, the domestication of the hardy goat was a fairly recent 11,000 years ago, in Mesopotamia; sheep were only dometicated around 10,000 to 11,000 years ago and not exactly next door, but in Anatolia.
The Motza goats were still wild-type bezoar, which once abounded in the region. Khalaily's theory for the domestication of the bezoar is that the Neolithics separated the kids and, simply, raised them up in the home. Once the wild baby goats identified people as mommy, they would be more amiable. We know the pigs at least were domestic, not completely wild boars that got trapped somehow, because their teeth and molars were in good condition, while boar teeth and molars get ground down over time as they grub for food, Khalaily explains. The researchers also found evidence of domesticated, not wild-type, wheat and barley, fava beans, and lentils. Fava had only been domesticated for about a thousand years by then, it seems: the bean is believed to have been tamed in the Galilee 10,000 years ago.
So, it seems to have been a bountiful period, though much remains mysterious about the transition period from hunting-gathering to agriculture. Another huge village much bigger than the state of culture had been thought to be able to sustain was discovered on the shores of the Sea of Galilee (which is a freshwater lake), and dated to 12,000 years ago. Large settlements have been found at Atlit (an underwater site covering 10 acres, says Dr. Jacob Vardi, who is directing the excavation at Motza together with Khalaily). There are also sites in Jordan and Turkey. With around 1,000 people, in the terms of the time, this was no village: it was a city, Khalaily says.
Suffer the children
Unfortunately for posterity, the floors of the houses were made of tightly-packed plaster which seems to have been kept clean, leaving behind few clues from the inhabitants’ daily lives.
But underneath the plaster floors at least 10 people were found buried, lying in fetal positions.
A third were men. A third were women. And, a third were children and babies. Which shows, Khalaily explains, that for the first known time in human history, children were considered something other than disposable.
"During the transitional time between hunting and gathering to settlement, the attitude towards children, in life and death, changed," he explains the theory.
No earlier burials of children have been found: "If a baby died, they didn't consider it important or bury it," he says. Or at least, there is no sign that they did. "But after people settled, they began burying the babies."
The remains of the men included young and old, a pretty normal population distribution, Khalaily observes. But some of the bodies lacked skulls.
A god, or Grandpa on the wall
What happened to the missing skulls? The archaeologists suspect that they had been covered in clay and used as ritual objects.
Plastered skulls 9,500 years old have been found all over the region, from southern Israel to Turkey, including at Gobekli Tepe. Some believe the skulls attest to an absolutely vast ancestor cult, that contributed to the successful rise of complex societies in the Neolithic.
Khalaily offers a twist on the theory. The Neolithics probably sanctified their leaders: "When a leader died, they would bury him, and after some years, after the body decayed, they would remove the skull and turn into a mask," he postulates.
The skull would be "fleshed out" using plaster, and was probably repainted to depict the deceased: "If he was good, he would have open eyes and if he was bad, the eyes would show it," Khalaily speculates. "The skull would then be placed in a public place as a guide for the younger generation of leaders. They might remain until the new leader had established his status in society – when the skull wouldn't be needed any more.
"It's like picture of one's grandfather on the wall. You leave it there until fixing up the house, but then once the wall is fresh and repainted, you don't put the picture back," Khalaily says.
Vardi suggests a plausible theory for why leaders are necessary. “In a group of wanderers, tensions would have broken up the group,” he offers. “Once you settle down, you’re stuck with objects which can’t be moved: real estate. Then tensions arise, with squabbles over land and property and you need someone who will manage these conflicts, a chief who makes decisions.”
What the archaeologists didn't find is pottery: this was a pre-pottery Neolithic culture. Among the stone tools that the archaeologists found in this pre-pottery Neolithic town were sickle blades, arrowheads, spearheads and axe heads. Broken obsidian blades seem to have arrived from Anatolia. Vardi believes the obsidian had wandered southwards by a prolonged barter process, not through direct exchange.
Some flint blades showed residues of bitumen, a mineral glue mined in the Dead Sea area. There were also some stone bracelets.
Around 8,700 years ago the village was abandoned. We do not know why. Maybe locally the resources became depleted, Vardi suggests. Maybe there was an epidemic. Thousands of years would pass, going by the dity and debris that collected over the long-forgotten Neolithic city. Then in around 200 B.C.E., a town would arise anew on the very same spot, under the aegis of the mighty Romans.

By Nir Hasson and Ruth Schuster Haaretz
You may be viewing yesterday's version of this page. To see the most up to date information please register for a free account.


Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist : Motza Neolithic City (Vote or comment on this photo)

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist (Vote or comment on this photo)

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist (Vote or comment on this photo)

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist (Vote or comment on this photo)

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist (Vote or comment on this photo)

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Motza Neolithic City
Motza Neolithic City submitted by motist

Do not use the above information on other web sites or publications without permission of the contributor.
Click here to see more info for this site

Nearby sites

Click here to view sites on an interactive map of the area

Key: Red: member's photo, Blue: 3rd party photo, Yellow: other image, Green: no photo - please go there and take one, Grey: site destroyed

Download sites to:
KML (Google Earth)
GPX (GPS waypoints)
CSV (Garmin/Navman)
CSV (Excel)

To unlock full downloads you need to sign up as a Contributory Member. Otherwise downloads are limited to 50 sites.


Turn off the page maps and other distractions

Nearby sites listing. In the following links * = Image available
 2.6km ESE 108° Tel Motza* Ancient Village or Settlement
 8.6km SE 127° Talpiot Tomb Rock Cut Tomb
 8.8km E 99° 2000 year old stone fragment in Jerusalem* Marker Stone
 8.9km ESE 104° Temple Mount* Ancient Temple
 9.0km ESE 107° City of David* Ancient Village or Settlement
 9.1km ESE 108° Hezekiah's Tunnel* Ancient Mine, Quarry or other Industry
 9.2km E 82° Shuafat road Chalcolithic period site* Ancient Village or Settlement
 10.1km SSE 147° Rachel's Tomb Ancient Temple
 15.3km WNW 288° Emmaus Ancient Village or Settlement
 15.3km WSW 247° Tel Beth-Shemesh* Artificial Mound
 17.3km SSE 148° Herodion* Ancient Palace
 18.3km SW 228° 2,000-year-old ‘Emperor’s Road’ near Beit Shemesh* Ancient Trackway
 18.3km SW 232° Ramat Beit Shemesh ritual baths* Ancient Village or Settlement
 20.9km WSW 238° Khirbet Qeiyafa* Ancient Village or Settlement
 22.4km WNW 288° Tel Gezer* Ancient Village or Settlement
 22.5km WSW 241° Tel Azeqa Ancient Village or Settlement
 23.2km SW 225° Khirbat Ethri* Ancient Village or Settlement
 24.5km SW 223° Tel Burgin* Ancient Village or Settlement
 26.6km NNE 16° The Gilgal associated with Elijah and Elisha Stone Circle
 27.7km W 266° Tel 'Ekron Ancient Village or Settlement
 28.2km ENE 78° Jericho* Ancient Village or Settlement
 28.2km SW 230° Tel Goded Ancient Village or Settlement
 28.7km NW 308° Lod Mosaic Ancient Palace
 28.8km NW 320° Mosaic and Stone structure near Shoham Ancient Village or Settlement
 30.1km WSW 249° Tel Gath Ancient Village or Settlement
View more nearby sites and additional images

<< Drizzlecombe Cairn 18

Carreg Gywir >>

Please add your thoughts on this site

Neolithic Britain And Ireland

Neolithic Britain And Ireland

Sponsors

Auto-Translation (Google)

Translate from English into:

"Motza Neolithic City" | Login/Create an Account | 0 News and Comments
  
Go back to top of page    Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Your Name: Anonymous [ Register Now ]
Subject:


Add your comment or contribution to this page. Spam or offensive posts are deleted immediately, don't even bother

<<< What is five plus one as a number? (Please type the answer to this question in the little box on the left)
You can also embed videos and other things. For Youtube please copy and paste the 'embed code'.
For Google Street View please include Street View in the text.
Create a web link like this: <a href="https://www.megalithic.co.uk">This is a link</a>  

Allowed HTML is:
<p> <b> <i> <a> <img> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <tt> <li> <ol> <ul> <object> <param> <embed> <iframe>

We would like to know more about this location. Please feel free to add a brief description and any relevant information in your own language.
Wir möchten mehr über diese Stätte erfahren. Bitte zögern Sie nicht, eine kurze Beschreibung und relevante Informationen in Deutsch hinzuzufügen.
Nous aimerions en savoir encore un peu sur les lieux. S'il vous plaît n'hesitez pas à ajouter une courte description et tous les renseignements pertinents dans votre propre langue.
Quisieramos informarnos un poco más de las lugares. No dude en añadir una breve descripción y otros datos relevantes en su propio idioma.